【116回向けに改訂】115回　必修問題　聞き流し

【116回向けに改訂】115回　必修問題　聞き流し

by たばえもんナース塾

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Medicine & Health MQNursing and ancillary servicesMQCNursing
🎙 たばえもんナース塾 👥 130K 📅 May 17, 2026 ⏱ 48 min 👁 9K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

nursingexamquestionsanswersstudy

Summary

This video is a comprehensive study resource for the Japanese National Nursing Examination (看護師国家試験), specifically targeting the 115th exam but updated for the 116th. It presents 50 mandatory questions (必修問題) in a listening format, covering both morning and afternoon sections. The creator, a nursing educator, provides answers and detailed explanations for each question, often including mnemonics and clinical correlations. The video also analyzes trends in the exam, noting that questions are increasingly based on understanding past questions rather than rote memorization. It emphasizes the importance of studying past general and situational questions, as many mandatory questions are derived from them. The creator recommends using question banks (QB) and studying them multiple times. The video is designed for nursing students preparing for the exam, offering a passive listening method to reinforce knowledge.

145 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides high practical value for nursing students, offering a large number of exam-style questions with clear explanations. The argumentation is solid, as the creator supports the analysis of exam trends with specific examples and statistics from past exams. The explanations are concise and pedagogically effective, often linking concepts to clinical practice. However, the video is primarily a review tool, not a source of new medical knowledge. The creator’s personal analysis of exam trends is plausible but not scientifically rigorous, as it is based on a limited sample of past exams.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite academic sources, but it references official exam statistics and trends. The creator mentions the source of some statistics (e.g., 国民生活基礎調査, 警察庁) but does not provide direct citations. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-structured with clear chapters. The creator’s analysis of exam trends is based on personal observation and may not be exhaustive, but it is presented transparently. The video includes a brief sponsorship segment, but it does not affect the educational content.

189 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a listening practice for the 115th national nursing exam, revised for the 116th exam.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a study aid for the Japanese national nursing exam, presenting 50 questions with answers and explanations. The content is based on official exam trends and past questions, but the creator's analysis is personal and not peer-reviewed. The information is accurate for exam preparation, but the source is a YouTube channel, not an official medical authority.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique approach to exam preparation by combining listening practice with detailed explanations and trend analysis. It highlights the shift in exam questions from rote memorization to understanding, which is a valuable insight for students. The creator’s analysis of past questions from general and situational sections appearing in mandatory questions is particularly useful.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Japanese Nursing Association — Official nursing association in Japan, relevant for exam and career information.
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare - Nursing — Official government page on nursing policies, relevant for exam standards.
  • National Center for Nursing Education — Resource for nursing education in Japan.
  • PubMed — Database for medical research, useful for deeper study of medical topics.

120 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in quantity of information and technical level, indicating a comprehensive and moderately technical video. The lower score in quality of information suggests that while the content is accurate, it lacks depth in some areas.

Reliability 7/10