【115回向け】問われやすい統計を紹介!男性の育児休業取得率は令和4年が17%,令和5年が30%ですが令和4年が出ると思われます

【115回向け】問われやすい統計を紹介!男性の育児休業取得率は令和4年が17%,令和5年が30%ですが令和4年が出ると思われます

🎙 たばえもんナース塾 👥 130K 📅 September 1, 2025 ⏱ 33 min 👁 52K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

national nursing examhealth statisticsdemographicsmortalitymorbidity

Summary

This video, presented by the channel ‘たばえもんナース塾’, is a tutorial aimed at nursing students preparing for the 115th Japanese national nursing exam. The creator explains that statistics questions in the exam are typically drawn from the ‘国民衛生の動向’ (National Health Trends) publication released two years prior to the exam. For the 115th exam (2026), the 2024 edition is expected to be the source. The video systematically reviews key statistics from this edition, covering population statistics (total population, age structure, dependency ratios), vital statistics (births, deaths, causes of death, infant mortality), health status indicators (life expectancy, morbidity, medical care utilization), and other relevant data such as childcare leave rates, household composition, and healthcare workforce numbers. The presenter emphasizes important points for the exam, such as the most common causes of death by age group, the definition of various mortality rates, and the distinction between population dynamics and population structure. The video also includes a brief analysis of past exam trends, noting that some statistics questions have been unprecedented, and advises viewers to understand the surrounding context of previously asked questions. The content is delivered in a clear, lecture-style format, with the presenter encouraging viewers to use the video for passive listening and to follow his social media for daily practice questions.

252 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides high value for its target audience by compiling and explaining a large amount of statistical data that is directly relevant to the nursing exam. The creator’s argumentation is logical and well-structured: he justifies the selection of the 2024 edition of ‘国民衛生の動向’ based on the pattern observed in previous exams, and he systematically presents each statistic with its definition, calculation method, and exam relevance. The explanations are clear and include mnemonics or simplifications to aid memorization. However, the video does not critically evaluate the data or discuss potential limitations or controversies. The argumentation is primarily descriptive and prescriptive, focusing on what to memorize rather than why the data is significant or how it might be interpreted. This is appropriate for the exam-preparation context but limits the depth of scientific analysis.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video demonstrates a reasonable level of scientific rigor by grounding its content in the official publication ‘国民衛生の動向’ and by explaining the rationale for using the 2024 edition. The creator also references his own website and social media for additional resources, but these are not primary sources. The title accurately reflects the content, which is specifically about statistics for the 115th exam, and the example given in the title (male childcare leave rates) is indeed discussed in the video. The video does not cite any external scientific studies or primary data sources beyond the textbook, which limits the depth of sourcing. The creator’s approach is systematic and transparent, which enhances trustworthiness, but the reliance on a single secondary source means that the information is not independently verified. Overall, the video is a reliable study aid for its intended purpose, but it should not be considered a comprehensive scientific reference.

296 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on statistics likely to appear in the 115th national nursing exam, including the specific example of male childcare leave acquisition rates.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video provides a comprehensive overview of statistics relevant to the Japanese national nursing exam, based on official data from the '国民衛生の動向' (National Health Trends) publication. The creator explains the rationale for selecting data from the 2024 edition for the 115th exam, demonstrating a systematic approach. However, the video is primarily a memorization aid and does not provide in-depth critical analysis or verification of the data. The information is presented clearly and is well-structured, but the reliance on a single secondary source (the textbook) limits the depth of sourcing.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • No discordant sources found — The video does not present any conflicting information or alternative viewpoints.

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a focused compilation of statistics likely to appear on the 115th Japanese national nursing exam, based on the 2024 edition of ‘国民衛生の動向’. Its originality lies in the systematic selection and explanation of data points that are frequently tested, along with mnemonics and clarifications of confusing definitions (e.g., the difference between ‘出生数’ and ‘出産数’). The video also offers strategic advice on which statistics to prioritize based on past exam trends.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • 国民衛生の動向 — The official publication by the Health and Welfare Statistics Association, which is the primary source for the statistics discussed.
  • Japanese National Nursing Exam — Official information from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare about the national nursing exam.
  • Total Fertility Rate — Wikipedia article explaining the concept of total fertility rate, which is a key statistic in the video.

200 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and technical level, reflecting the video's comprehensive coverage and use of specialized terminology. The quality of information and overall reliability are moderate, indicating that while the content is accurate and well-presented, it relies on a single secondary source and lacks critical analysis. The video is best suited for exam preparation rather than in-depth scientific understanding.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.