Space, time and Shakespeare - Paul Glendinning

Space, time and Shakespeare - Paul Glendinning

🎙 Paul Glendinning 👥 736K 📅 May 27, 2026 ⏱ 52 min 👁 12K 📄 science communication 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Shakespearemathematicsalmanacmoon phasescounting enemyJohn DeeCopernicustechnologyearly modern England

Summary

In this Oxford Mathematics public lecture, Paul Glendinning, Beyer Professor of Applied Mathematics at the University of Manchester, explores how mathematical and scientific ideas are woven into Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets. He argues that everyone has a ‘mathematical eye’ for making sense of the world, and Shakespeare’s works provide a rich source to examine how people in early modern England used mathematics and technology in everyday life. He begins with two examples: estimating the size of an enemy army by multiplying density by area, a technique used since Julius Caesar and still relevant today, and using almanacs to determine moon phases for staging a play, as in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. He explains the arithmetic behind lunar cycles and the golden number. He then briefly profiles three mathematicians: John Dee, Leonard Digges, and Thomas Digges, highlighting their connections to Shakespeare. The talk aims to show that science and the arts are not separate, but intertwined in human culture.

158 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into the historical context of Shakespeare’s works, showing how mathematical and scientific ideas were part of everyday life. The argumentation is solid, based on specific examples from the plays and historical sources. Glendinning clearly explains the mathematical concepts, such as the calculation of moon phases, making them accessible to a general audience. He also connects these ideas to modern practices, like using drones and AI for counting crowds, demonstrating the enduring relevance of these techniques.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk demonstrates scientific rigor by referencing several scholarly works, including Jessica Otis’s ‘By the Numbers’, Adam Cohen’s ‘Shakespeare and Technology’, Dan Falk’s ‘The Science of Shakespeare’, and Rob Eastaway’s ‘Much Ado About Numbers’. Glendinning distinguishes his approach from these works, clarifying his focus on everyday mathematical practices rather than major scientific revolutions. The title accurately reflects the content, which explores the intersection of space, time, and Shakespeare’s works. The talk is well-structured and the sources are appropriately cited.

174 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which explores how mathematical and scientific ideas appear in Shakespeare's works.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk is given by a professor of applied mathematics, well-structured, and references several scholarly works. It clearly distinguishes between the speaker's interpretations and established facts, and uses historical sources appropriately.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • By the Numbers — Recent book by Jessica Otis on early modern England and number systems.
  • Shakespeare and Technology — Book by Adam Cohen examining technologies in the 16th and 17th centuries and their relation to Shakespeare.
  • The Science of Shakespeare — Book by Dan Falk mapping scientific changes onto Shakespeare's works.
  • Much Ado About Numbers — Book by Rob Eastaway on number games and puzzles in Shakespeare's time.

Concurring Sources

  • By the Numbers — Supports the discussion of number systems in early modern England.
  • Shakespeare and Technology — Aligns with the talk's focus on technology in Shakespeare's era.

Dissenting Sources

  • The Science of Shakespeare — Glendinning explicitly states that his approach differs from Falk's, as he is not mapping major scientific changes onto Shakespeare.
  • Much Ado About Numbers — Glendinning notes some overlap but clarifies that his focus is on everyday mathematical practices rather than number games.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a fresh perspective on Shakespeare by focusing on everyday mathematical practices rather than major scientific discoveries. It highlights how almanacs and simple arithmetic were part of common knowledge, and how Shakespeare used these in his plays. The connection between the Digges family and Shakespeare adds a personal dimension. The talk bridges the gap between science and the arts, arguing for their interconnectedness.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Golden number (Wikipedia) — The golden number is used in the calculation of the date of Easter and is related to the Metonic cycle, which is relevant to the lunar calculations discussed.
  • Metonic cycle (Wikipedia) — The 19-year cycle that aligns lunar months with the solar year, fundamental to the almanac calculations.
  • John Dee (Wikipedia) — A prominent mathematician and advisor to Queen Elizabeth I, mentioned in the talk.
  • Thomas Digges (Wikipedia) — An early supporter of Copernican theory, also mentioned.

151 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and reliability, reflecting the speaker's expertise and use of credible sources. The quantity of information is also high, with many examples and explanations. The technical level is moderate, making the talk accessible to a general audience while still providing depth.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.