African Environmental Thoughts and Relational Ontologies | Webinar

African Environmental Thoughts and Relational Ontologies | Webinar

🎙 Future Africa UP 👥 362 📅 April 7, 2026 ⏱ 87 min 👁 26 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

African environmental thoughtrelational ontologiesneoliberal environmentalismcolonialityenvironmental justice

Summary

The webinar, hosted by Future Africa at the University of Pretoria, explores African environmental thoughts and relational ontologies. Professor Maano Ramutsindela introduces the topic, questioning the Western-centric history of environmental thought and emphasizing the need to recover African perspectives. Dr. Tafadzwa Mushonga chairs the session, introducing Dr. Anelma Matus, who presents a talk titled ‘Attempt toward African Environmentalisms.’ Matus argues that contemporary environmental crises in Africa are rooted in colonial and neoliberal ontologies that separate nature from society. He traces the history of conservation in Africa, highlighting how colonial laws dispossessed black communities and created racialized landscapes. He critiques neoliberal environmentalism, including carbon markets and green growth projects, which often harm local communities. Drawing on thinkers like Aimé Césaire, Amílcar Cabral, and Wangari Maathai, Matus calls for an environmentalism grounded in African experiences, relationality, and liberation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing African epistemologies and ontologies in global environmental discourse.

151 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into African environmental thought, challenging dominant Western narratives and offering a decolonial perspective. The argumentation is well-structured, drawing on historical examples and scholarly references to support the critique of neoliberal environmentalism. The speaker effectively connects theoretical concepts to concrete cases, such as the displacement of communities for conservation and the impact of carbon markets. However, the presentation is largely opinion-based and lacks empirical data or systematic evidence, which limits its scientific rigor. The argument is persuasive but could benefit from more diverse perspectives and counterarguments.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates a good level of scientific rigor, with references to academic works and historical events. The sources cited include scholars like Jason Moore, Aimé Césaire, and Amílcar Cabral, which are relevant and credible. However, the presentation does not provide a systematic review of literature or empirical data, and the sources are not always explicitly cited in the video. The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on African environmental thoughts and relational ontologies. The discussion is well-aligned with the title, though it could have been more comprehensive in covering diverse African perspectives.

199 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on African environmental thought and relational ontologies, as discussed by the speakers.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The webinar features academic experts in environmental humanities and political ecology, providing a well-structured argument grounded in scholarly literature and case studies. However, the presentation is largely opinion-based and lacks systematic peer review or empirical data, and the video has very low viewership and no audience engagement.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Silent Spring — Referenced as a foundational work in modern environmental thought.
  • The Violence of Conservation in Africa — Mentioned as a collaborative work by the speakers.
  • Discourse on Colonialism — Referenced in the context of coloniality and thinkification.
  • Capitalism in the Web of Life — Cited to discuss the relationship between capitalism and nature.
  • Notebook of a Return to the Native Land — Quoted to illustrate the suffering and resistance in colonial contexts.
  • Mine Mine Mine — Referenced to discuss the intersection of mining, violence, and the body.

Concurring Sources

  • Silent Spring — Referenced as a foundational work in modern environmental thought, aligning with the webinar's historical perspective.
  • The Violence of Conservation in Africa — Mentioned as a collaborative work by the speakers, supporting the discussion on conservation's impacts.

Dissenting Sources

  • Neoliberal environmentalism — The webinar critiques neoliberal environmentalism, which some might argue has positive aspects, but no specific discordant sources are cited.

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar contributes to the growing discourse on African environmental thought by challenging the dominance of Western environmentalism and proposing a decolonial framework. It emphasizes the importance of relational ontologies and the need to center African experiences and knowledge systems in environmental debates. The speaker’s call to ‘resituate’ neoliberal environmentalism offers a fresh perspective on how to address environmental crises in Africa.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Political ecology — Provides background on the field that informs the webinar’s approach.
  • Decoloniality — Relevant to the critique of coloniality in environmental thought.
  • Environmental justice — Connects to the webinar’s focus on justice and liberation.

103 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the webinar's rich content and academic depth. The technical level is moderate, indicating that the content is accessible to a general audience but still requires some background knowledge. The overall reliability is good, though the presentation is opinion-based rather than empirically rigorous.

Reliability 7/10