Zapier vs Make — Comment faire son choix en 2022 ?

Zapier vs Make — Comment faire son choix en 2022 ?

by Shubham SHARMA

Applied Sciences & Engineering Economics & Finance KJMVManagement of specific areasKJMV3IT and information systems management
🎙 Shubham SHARMA 👥 313K 📅 July 2, 2021 ⏱ 22 min 👁 16K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-24
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ZapierMakeIntegromatautomationworkflow

Summary

In this video, Shubham Sharma compares two popular automation tools: Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat). He aims to help viewers choose the right tool based on their needs and skill level. The comparison covers several criteria: number of integrations, features, user experience, testing capabilities, pricing, templates, and advanced features. Zapier offers over 3000 integrations, while Make has around 800, but Make’s integrations are often deeper, offering more triggers, actions, and searches. Make provides more advanced features like data stores, error handling, and webhooks, but Zapier is simpler and more user-friendly, making it ideal for beginners. In terms of pricing, Make’s free plan is more generous, allowing unlimited automations and no feature restrictions, while Zapier limits the number of zaps and charges for multi-step automations. Both tools have templates, but Make’s are more powerful yet harder to configure. The creator concludes that Zapier is great for simple automations and beginners, while Make is better for complex workflows and advanced users. He also mentions his own training courses and affiliate links.

169 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable, practical insights for anyone considering automation tools. The creator demonstrates real-world examples, showing how to set up automations in both tools, which helps illustrate the differences in user experience and capabilities. His argumentation is solid, as he systematically compares each criterion and explains the trade-offs. He also shares personal anecdotes, such as using Make for rental management, which adds credibility. However, the comparison is based on his subjective experience and may not cover all edge cases. The value lies in the hands-on demonstrations and clear explanations, making it useful for both beginners and intermediate users.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a subjective expert opinion, not a scientific study. The creator does not cite external sources, but he provides links to his own training courses and affiliate offers. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-structured with chapters. The information is based on the creator’s experience and may become outdated, but at the time of publication, it was relevant. The lack of external references reduces the scientific rigor, but for a practical comparison, it is acceptable. The creator’s transparency about his preferences and the detailed demonstrations enhance the overall quality.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a comparison between Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) to help viewers choose.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video provides a detailed, practical comparison based on hands-on demonstrations and personal experience. The creator is transparent about his preferences and provides concrete examples. However, the information is subjective and may become outdated quickly; no external sources are cited beyond promotional links.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Make (ex Integromat) - 1 month free on standard version — Affiliate link for Make, mentioned in the video as a way to get a free month.
  • Formation Make (ex Integromat) — Creator's paid training course on Make, mentioned in the video.
  • Formation Zapier 100% gratuite — Creator's free training course on Zapier, mentioned in the video.
  • Notion templates — Creator's Notion templates, mentioned in the video description.
  • Newsletter du dimanche — Creator's newsletter, mentioned in the video description.
  • Suggestion de vidéo — Platform for viewers to suggest video ideas, mentioned in the video.
  • LinkedIn de Shubham Sharma — Creator's LinkedIn profile, mentioned in the video description.
  • Formation Notion 100% gratuite — Creator's free training course on Notion, mentioned in the video description.

Concurring Sources

  • Zapier vs Make: Which Automation Tool is Right for You? — A blog post from Make comparing the two tools, likely aligning with the video's points on features and pricing.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a practical, hands-on comparison of Zapier and Make, highlighting not only the number of integrations but also the depth of integration and advanced features. It provides a clear decision framework based on user needs and skill level. The creator’s demonstrations of setting up automations in both tools are particularly useful for beginners.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Zapier — Official website for Zapier, where users can explore integrations and pricing.
  • Make — Official website for Make, offering automation tools and templates.
  • No-code — Wikipedia article on no-code development platforms, providing context on the broader movement.
  • Webhooks — Wikipedia article on webhooks, a key feature mentioned in the video for advanced automations.
  • API — Wikipedia article on APIs, relevant to the advanced HTTP requests feature in Make.

129 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the detailed comparison and practical examples. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a broad audience. The overall reliability is good, though the subjective nature and lack of external sources slightly lower the score.

Reliability 7/10