Ce que je paye en logiciel par mois ! J'ai abusé ...

Ce que je paye en logiciel par mois ! J'ai abusé ...

🎙 Shubham SHARMA 👥 313K 📅 May 17, 2022 ⏱ 24 min 👁 21K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-24
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

logicielsabonnementscoûtsbusinessproductivité

Summary

In this video, Shubham SHARMA presents a detailed list of all the software subscriptions he pays for monthly, aiming to cancel three of them by the end. He goes through each tool, explaining its purpose, cost, and his usage. The list includes password managers, design tools, community platforms, email marketing, accounting, video editing, blogging, Google Workspace, webinar platforms, automation, Notion, hosting, course platforms, landing page builders, form builders, video creation tools, YouTube optimization, Twitter scheduling, and streaming. He evaluates each tool’s value and decides to cancel StreamYard, as he uses it infrequently. He also mentions plans to switch from ConvertKit to Sendinblue due to cost. The total monthly cost is calculated at around 728 euros, which he justifies as equivalent to a part-time employee’s salary. The video ends with a focus on a specific tool, likely Tella, which he praises highly.

141 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a valuable, honest overview of a creator’s software stack, including costs and perceived value. The argumentation is based on personal experience and practical use cases, which is relevant for entrepreneurs and creators. However, the reasoning is subjective and lacks comparative analysis or objective metrics. The decision to cancel StreamYard is based on low usage, but the justification is brief. The creator’s enthusiasm for certain tools (e.g., Tella) is evident, but the argumentation could be more structured.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite external sources; it relies solely on the creator’s experience. The description provides links to his own products and social media, but no references to studies or official documentation. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-structured with clear chapters. The creator’s expertise in the field adds some credibility, but the lack of verifiable sources limits the scientific rigor.

160 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a personal overview of monthly software expenses, including a challenge to cancel three subscriptions.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a personal, experience-based review of software tools, with no external sources or data to verify claims. The creator's expertise in the field adds credibility, but the content is subjective and promotional in parts.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Notion templates — Creator's own Notion templates, mentioned as a resource.
  • Newsletter — Creator's newsletter, mentioned as a way to stay updated.
  • Video suggestions — Platform for viewers to suggest video ideas.
  • Video editor LinkedIn — LinkedIn profile of the video editor.
  • Creator's LinkedIn — Creator's LinkedIn profile.
  • Free Notion course — Free Notion course offered by the creator.

Concurring Sources

  • 1Password — Password manager mentioned as essential.
  • Canva — Design tool used for thumbnails and social media.
  • Notion — Productivity tool used for organization.

Dissenting Sources

  • StreamYard — The creator canceled this subscription due to low usage, but the tool is widely used for live streaming.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a transparent look at the software costs of a content creator, which is not commonly shared in such detail. It provides practical insights into tool selection and cost management. The creator’s decision to cancel a subscription based on usage is a good example of cost optimization.

Pour aller plus loin :

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced distribution across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and technical level. This indicates a video that provides a substantial amount of practical information, though the quality and reliability are moderate due to the subjective nature of the content.

Reliability 5/10