ORAux 2026 : l'épreuve d'entretien d'Audencia Business School

ORAux 2026 : l'épreuve d'entretien d'Audencia Business School

🎙 Major Prépa 👥 101K 📅 May 31, 2026 ⏱ 18 min 👁 28K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Audenciaentretienprépaculture généraleconcours

Summary

This video, hosted by Major Prépa, features an interview with Denis Boissin, Director of Programs at Audencia Business School, and Frédéric Brétécher, a professor of general culture, discussing the new format of the oral interview for the 2026 admissions. The interview has been restructured: it now includes a collective preparation phase and a collective debate, followed by an individual interview. The collective phase involves groups of six to eight candidates who are divided into two subgroups to prepare a topic (a quote or keyword) for 20 minutes, then engage in a 15-minute debate. The evaluation is 40% based on collective dynamics and 60% on individual performance. The new format aims to assess candidates’ ability to collaborate, listen, and build a shared argument, reflecting the skills needed in management. The video also clarifies that the collective test is separate from the individual interview, with coefficients of 5 and 8 respectively. The speakers emphasize the importance of general culture, which is not limited to a specific theme but encompasses a broad range of knowledge. They provide practical advice for candidates, such as practicing with quotes, managing time, and taking on roles like timekeeper. The video concludes with reassurance that candidates are well-prepared and encourages them to enjoy the process.

207 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable, insider information about the new interview format at Audencia, which is directly relevant for prospective candidates. The argumentation is solid, as both speakers are directly involved in the process and provide concrete details about the structure, evaluation criteria, and expectations. They also address common concerns, such as the fear of the new format and the role of general culture, with reasoned explanations. The discussion is coherent and well-structured, with each point building on the previous one.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the information is based on the expertise of the speakers, but no external sources or data are cited to support their claims. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a focused discussion on the interview process. The video is primarily informative and promotional, but it does not engage with any scientific literature or empirical evidence.

156 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a detailed discussion of the interview process at Audencia Business School.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video features two experts (Denis Boissin, Director of Programs at Audencia, and Frédéric Brétécher, a professor of general culture) providing detailed, insider information about the new interview format. The information is specific and credible, but it is primarily promotional and lacks external sources or data to verify claims.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Audencia Business School — Official website of the school, which may provide additional details on the interview process.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique insider perspective on the new interview format at Audencia, which is not widely known. It provides detailed information about the structure, evaluation criteria, and expectations, which is highly valuable for candidates. The discussion also highlights the importance of general culture and collaborative skills, which are increasingly relevant in management education.

Pour aller plus loin :

102 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, moderate technical level, and good reliability. This indicates a content that is informative and credible, but not highly technical or research-oriented.

Reliability 7/10