Un 10, un 13 et un 20 en Géopo ESSEC (feat. F. Munier)

Un 10, un 13 et un 20 en Géopo ESSEC (feat. F. Munier)

by Frédéric Munier

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Geopolitics & Defence JPSInternational relationsJPSLGeopolitics
🎙 Frédéric Munier 👥 101K 📅 November 30, 2025 ⏱ 32 min 👁 7K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

arc de crisedissertationméthodologieconcoursgéopolitique

Summary

In this video, Frédéric Munier, a geopolitics professor and examiner for the ESSEC HGGMC exam, analyzes three real exam copies from the 2025 BCE competition, graded 10, 13, and 20. He begins by reviewing the official jury report, highlighting key expectations such as the importance of defining the central notion (here, ‘arc de crise’), structuring a clear introduction with a paradox and problematique, and using concrete examples. He then compares the introductions and conclusions of the three copies, pointing out strengths and weaknesses. The 10/20 copy fails to define ‘arc de crise’ properly, instead focusing on ‘crise’ and introducing the irrelevant concept of ‘mondialisation’. The 13/20 copy better addresses the notion but has a less precise problematique and a short conclusion. The 20/20 copy excels in defining the concept, posing a sharp problematique, and structuring a coherent argument. Munier also offers general advice on writing paragraphs and emphasizes the importance of reading jury reports. The video is aimed at students preparing for competitive exams and provides practical insights into what examiners look for.

173 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the expectations of examiners for the HGGMC essay, based on real examples and the official jury report. The argumentation is solid, as Munier systematically compares the three copies against the criteria from the jury report, illustrating each point with concrete excerpts. He effectively demonstrates how the quality of the introduction and problematique influences the final grade. The advice is practical and actionable, making it highly useful for students. However, the analysis is somewhat subjective, as it relies on Munier’s interpretation of the copies, and the video does not provide a comprehensive breakdown of the entire essays, focusing mainly on introductions and conclusions.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is rigorous in its use of sources: it references the official jury report and provides links to the three actual exam copies in the description. The analysis is grounded in these primary sources, enhancing credibility. The title accurately reflects the content, as the video indeed analyzes copies graded 10, 13, and 20. The video does not cite external academic sources beyond the jury report and the copies, but this is appropriate for a methodological tutorial. The adequacy between title and content is high, with no misleading elements.

212 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the video analyzes three real exam copies graded 10, 13, and 20, with commentary from Frédéric Munier.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video is presented by an experienced professor and exam corrector, and is based on official jury reports and real exam copies. The analysis is methodical and well-structured, though it relies on subjective interpretation of the copies.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Copie 10/20 — Real exam copy analyzed in the video, graded 10/20.
  • Copie 13/20 — Real exam copy analyzed in the video, graded 13/20.
  • Copie 20/20 — Real exam copy analyzed in the video, graded 20/20.

Concurring Sources

  • Rapport du jury HGGMC 2025 — The video references the official jury report, which is not directly linked but is mentioned as the basis for the analysis.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique pedagogical approach by dissecting real exam copies with commentary from an examiner, providing concrete examples of what distinguishes different grade levels. It bridges the gap between theoretical advice and practical application.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Arc de crise — Wikipedia article on the concept of arc of crisis, relevant to understanding the central notion.
  • Géopolitique — Overview of geopolitics as a discipline, providing background for the subject.
  • Méthodologie de la dissertation — General methodology for essays, useful for students.

85 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the video's rich content and use of primary sources. The technical level is moderate, suitable for students, and reliability is high due to the examiner's expertise. Overall, the video is well-balanced and effective for its target audience.

Reliability 8/10