Sciences Po Live - Urban School – Master Urban Governance, Policy and Planning

Sciences Po Live - Urban School – Master Urban Governance, Policy and Planning

🎙 Sciences Po 👥 68K 📅 January 29, 2026 ⏱ 34 min 👁 770 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

urban governanceurban policySciences Pomaster's programcareer prospects

Summary

This video is a live presentation of the Master in Urban Governance, Policy and Planning at Sciences Po’s Urban School. The academic advisor, Cyriel Pelletier, explains the program’s objectives, structure, and two tracks: Governing the Large Metropolis (GLM) and Governing Ecological Transitions in Cities (GETIC). The program is two years, taught in English, and emphasizes multidisciplinary training, combining social sciences with practical skills. Two students, Natalia and Amelie, share their experiences, highlighting the international cohort, field trips, capstone projects, and career outcomes. Natalia, from Colombia, is interning at the OECD, while Amelie, a recent graduate, works at CIRED. The video covers admission requirements, teaching methods, and professionalization, noting that 60% of graduates find jobs before graduation and 98% within six months. The Q&A session clarifies the difference between study trips and capstone projects. Overall, the video provides a comprehensive overview for prospective students.

143 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable firsthand information about the program, including detailed explanations of the curriculum, tracks, and career prospects. The argumentation is solid, supported by testimonials from current students and alumni, which add credibility. However, the content is promotional in nature, and the claims about employment rates are not independently verified.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is an official institutional presentation, so the information is reliable but not independently sourced. The title accurately reflects the content. The description includes links to Sciences Po’s social media and app, but no external academic sources are cited. The presentation is well-structured and informative, but lacks critical analysis or external validation.

119 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a live presentation of the Master's program.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is an official presentation by Sciences Po, featuring the academic advisor and two students/alumni. It provides accurate information about the program structure, tracks, and career outcomes, but lacks external sources or verifiable data beyond the institution's own claims.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Sciences Po App - App Store — Link to the Sciences Po app on the App Store, mentioned in the video description.
  • Sciences Po LinkedIn — Link to Sciences Po's LinkedIn page, provided in the video description.
  • Sciences Po Snapchat — Link to Sciences Po's Snapchat, provided in the video description.

Concurring Sources

  • Sciences Po Urban School — Official website of the Urban School, providing program details and admissions information.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers an insider perspective on the Master’s program, with detailed information on curriculum, tracks, and career outcomes. It highlights the program’s international focus and practical training, which is valuable for prospective students.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Urban governance — Provides a general overview of urban governance concepts.
  • Sciences Po Urban School — Official website of the Urban School, offering more details on the program.
  • OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities — Relevant to Natalia’s internship and urban policy research.

84 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the comprehensive and reliable content. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a general audience. The overall reliability is strong, given the institutional source.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.