We have a new top AI video generator! Hailuo 2.3 review

We have a new top AI video generator! Hailuo 2.3 review

🎙 AI Search 👥 727K 📅 October 28, 2025 ⏱ 18 min 👁 70K 📄 review 🧭 2026-09-07
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Hailuo 2.3AI video generatorSora 2Veo 3.1benchmark

Summary

The video is a detailed review of Hailuo 2.3, a new AI video generation model, comparing it with Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 across various test prompts. The reviewer tests high-action scenes, physics understanding, prompt adherence, emotional expressions, anatomy, character consistency, image-to-video, anime style, and text rendering. Hailuo 2.3 generally outperforms its competitors in high-action and physics-heavy prompts, producing more dynamic and accurate results. It also excels at generating existing characters like Will Smith, which other models restrict. However, it lacks built-in audio, supports only up to 1080p and 6-second clips at that resolution, and struggles with text and diagrams. The reviewer highlights its presets and camera control features, and notes that it offers four free generations per day. Overall, Hailuo 2.3 is positioned as a leading AI video generator, especially for action and physics, but with limitations in audio and text handling.

143 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial value by offering a hands-on comparative analysis of three leading AI video generators. The reviewer uses a variety of carefully designed prompts to test specific capabilities, such as physics, action, and prompt understanding, and presents the outputs side-by-side, allowing viewers to visually assess the differences. The argumentation is solid, as it is based on direct observations and consistent criteria across models. However, the evaluation is subjective and lacks quantitative metrics or statistical robustness. The reviewer acknowledges limitations and does not claim perfection, which adds credibility. The inclusion of real-world examples (e.g., water freezing, figure skating) helps ground the assessment. The video also provides practical information on usage, presets, and camera control, enhancing its utility for viewers.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the review is based on empirical testing but lacks a controlled methodology (e.g., no seed variation, no multiple runs). The sources cited are primarily the tool’s official website and the channel’s own resources, with no external references to technical papers or benchmarks. The title accurately reflects the content, as the video indeed reviews Hailuo 2.3 and compares it to other top models. The description includes affiliate links, indicating a potential commercial bias, but the review itself appears balanced, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses. The public comments are generally positive, with viewers appreciating the humor and the comparisons, though some express a desire for open-source alternatives.

245 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a review of Hailuo 2.3, positioning it as a top AI video generator.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The review is based on direct hands-on testing with multiple comparative prompts against Sora 2 and Veo 3.1, providing concrete examples and observations. However, the methodology is not fully transparent (e.g., no seed control, no statistical analysis), and the channel has a commercial interest in promoting Hailuo (affiliate links).

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Hailuo AI official website — The tool being reviewed; link provided in the description for free trials.
  • AI Search newsletter — The channel's newsletter for AI news and tools.
  • AI Search tools and jobs — The channel's platform for discovering AI tools and jobs.
  • Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada GPU — Equipment used by the reviewer, mentioned in the description.
  • Dell Precision 5690 — Equipment used by the reviewer, mentioned in the description.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a fresh, hands-on comparison of the latest AI video generators, highlighting Hailuo 2.3’s strengths in high-action and physics-based generation. It provides practical insights into prompt engineering and camera control, which are valuable for creators. The review also notes the absence of audio and text limitations, which are often overlooked in promotional content.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and quality of information, reflecting the detailed comparative testing. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a general audience interested in AI tools. The overall reliability is good, though limited by the lack of external validation and potential bias.

Reliability 7/10

💬 Positif : Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, le climat est très positif, avec des réactions humoristiques et enthousiastes, notamment sur les tests de Will Smith et les comparaisons, bien que certains expriment le souhait d'une version open source.