Co Created Futures Conference - Intros and Materials session

Co Created Futures Conference - Intros and Materials session

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Climate & Ecology RNThe environmentRNUSustainability
🎙 Sustainable Futures 👥 116 📅 January 9, 2026 ⏱ 110 min 👁 34 📄 documentary 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

sustainable futuresinterdisciplinary researchmaterials sciencenature investmentconference

Summary

The video is a recording of the introductory and materials session of the Co-Created Futures Conference, held on December 3rd at the University of Manchester. The session begins with Dr. Helen Holmes, co-director of the Sustainable Futures platform, welcoming attendees and outlining the day’s agenda. She introduces the platform’s role in fostering interdisciplinary collaboration across the university and its six key research themes: resilience, energy, equity, nature, materials, and skills. Following her introduction, representatives from partner institutions present their work: Michaela Keenan from the Henry Royce Institute discusses the UK’s national institute for advanced materials research, highlighting its facilities and industry collaboration programs. Karen from the Manchester Urban Institute focuses on urban transformations, covering themes like built environment, transport, green cities, and health. Tim Foster from the Manchester Environmental Research Institute outlines research areas including land and resource futures, global change and one health, and environmental data science. Alice Larkin represents the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, celebrating its 25th anniversary and describing its interdisciplinary research on climate change, circular economy, and energy. The keynote address is delivered by Abigail Herron, Global Head of Nature at Aviva Investors, who discusses the growing importance of nature in investment decisions. She shares examples of how pollinator decline impacts businesses and highlights the need for companies to integrate nature-related risks into their strategies. She also introduces the School for Systems Change in Finance, a co-creation initiative to transform financial systems. The session concludes with a call for collaboration and a focus on maintaining personal sustainability in the field.

256 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the structure and priorities of sustainability research at the University of Manchester and its partner institutions. The presentations are informative, offering a clear overview of each institute’s mission and current research areas. The keynote by Abigail Herron is particularly valuable, as it bridges the gap between environmental science and finance, illustrating how nature-related risks are becoming central to investment strategies. Her argument is well-supported with concrete examples, such as the impact of pollinator decline on orange juice production and the need for companies to address these risks. The overall argumentation is coherent and persuasive, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the integration of nature into economic decision-making.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video maintains a high level of scientific rigor, with presentations from established researchers and practitioners. The speakers reference their institutional affiliations and ongoing projects, lending credibility to their statements. However, the content is primarily descriptive and does not delve into detailed methodologies or data, which limits its depth. The sources cited are institutional and professional, but no specific academic references are provided. The title accurately reflects the content, as the video focuses on introductions and the materials session. The technical quality is adequate, though some slides are difficult to read, and there are minor presentation issues. Overall, the video is a reliable source for understanding the landscape of sustainability research and investment, but it is not a peer-reviewed scientific contribution.

250 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the video covers the introductions and materials session of the Co-Created Futures Conference.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a recording of an academic conference session, featuring presentations by recognized experts from reputable institutions (University of Manchester, Henry Royce Institute, Aviva Investors). The content is informative and well-structured, but it is not peer-reviewed and represents institutional perspectives. The technical quality is moderate, with some presentation issues.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of interdisciplinary sustainability research at the University of Manchester and its partner institutions. It highlights the growing integration of nature-related considerations into financial decision-making, as exemplified by Abigail Herron’s keynote. The session emphasizes the importance of co-creation and collaboration across disciplines, industry, and policy. It also introduces the School for Systems Change in Finance, an innovative initiative to transform financial systems. The video is valuable for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand the landscape of sustainability research and investment.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Sustainable Development Goals — Relevant to the conference’s focus on sustainability challenges.
  • Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures — Directly related to the integration of nature into financial decision-making.
  • School for Systems Change — The initiative mentioned by Abigail Herron, though the exact URL may vary.

140 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced performance across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the video's informative nature. The technical level is moderate, indicating accessibility to a broad audience. The overall reliability is strong, supported by credible institutional sources.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.