Co-created Futures Conference - Nature session

Co-created Futures Conference - Nature session

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Climate & Ecology RNThe environmentRNUSustainability
🎙 Sustainable Futures 👥 116 📅 January 9, 2026 ⏱ 85 min 👁 26 📄 conference talk 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Earth ObservationMicroplasticsSewageConservationCo-production

Summary

This session from the Co-created Futures Conference focuses on nature and features three presentations. Dr. Sarah Sutcliffe introduces the JEO4C project, which examines social justice risks of Earth Observation technologies in conservation across four case studies. She highlights issues of data neutrality, privacy, power imbalances, and indigenous data sovereignty, and emphasizes co-production with local communities. Professor Jamie Woodward presents findings on microplastic pollution in UK rivers, linking it to untreated sewage discharges. He shows that microplastics are widespread on riverbeds and calls for action to reduce sewage spills. Dr. Jenna Ashton discusses community-led land care and design, bridging feminist environmental humanities and heritage studies, and advocates for practices that honor both biodiversity and cultural knowledge. The session underscores that nature conservation must be guided by justice, care, and collaboration.

129 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high, as it presents current research projects with real-world implications. Sarah Sutcliffe’s talk provides a critical perspective on Earth Observation, challenging the notion of data neutrality and highlighting social justice concerns. Jamie Woodward’s data on microplastics is compelling and supports urgent policy action. Jenna Ashton’s interdisciplinary approach adds depth. The argumentation is solid, with each speaker grounding their claims in their research and referencing specific projects and data. However, the talks are introductory and lack detailed evidence, but they effectively communicate the importance of their work.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the speakers are experts and reference their own research and funded projects, but specific citations are not provided in the talk. The title accurately reflects the content. The session is part of a conference, so the format is more informative than rigorous. The sources mentioned include the ESRC-funded project and data from the Guardian, but no direct URLs are given. The adequacy between title and content is good.

180 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a nature-focused session within a broader conference on co-created futures.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The session features three expert speakers presenting ongoing research projects with clear methodologies and references to funded projects (ESRC) and published data. However, as a conference recording, it lacks peer-reviewed detail and some claims are presented without full citations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • JEO4C Project — Mentioned by Sarah Sutcliffe as the project she is involved in.
  • Guardian analysis of sewage discharges — Referenced by Jamie Woodward for data on sewage spills in UK rivers.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The session provides an original perspective on the intersection of technology, environment, and social justice. Sarah Sutcliffe’s concept of ‘datascapes’ is novel and highlights the social dimensions of Earth Observation. Jamie Woodward’s research on riverbed microplastics adds to the growing body of evidence on pollution. Jenna Ashton’s interdisciplinary approach offers a unique lens. The emphasis on co-production is a valuable contribution to conservation practice.

Pour aller plus loin :

91 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with moderate technical level and reliability. This indicates a session that is informative and credible, but not highly technical or deeply sourced.

Reliability 7/10