RETEX - Retours d'expériences cursus & stage, avec Théophile Schuft (étudiant GM/ST 09)

RETEX - Retours d'expériences cursus & stage, avec Théophile Schuft (étudiant GM/ST 09)

Applied Sciences & Engineering Education JNEducationJNRCareers guidance
🎙 Théophile Schuft 👥 8K 📅 April 14, 2026 ⏱ 36 min 👁 63 📄 testimonial 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

internshipmechanical engineeringGermanystudent exchangeroller coaster

Summary

Théophile Schuft, a final-year mechanical engineering student at UTT, shares his experience of a year in Munich, Germany, combining an internship at Maurer Ride, a roller coaster manufacturer, and an exchange semester at the Hochschule München. He details his academic background at UTT, including core courses and specialized mechanical engineering subjects. He explains his motivation for choosing the roller coaster industry, highlighting its innovative and multidisciplinary nature. He describes the application process, the company profile, and the tasks he performed, mainly mechanical design and prototyping. He also discusses the challenges and benefits of living in Munich, such as high rent and administrative hurdles. He then talks about his exchange semester, where he took courses in mechatronics, machine learning, and automotive engineering, and worked on a project with a company. He reflects on the skills he gained, emphasizing the importance of adaptability and asking questions. He concludes by recommending certain UTT courses that proved useful in his professional experience.

158 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the practical application of mechanical engineering studies in a specialized industry. The speaker’s argumentation is coherent and based on personal experience, which adds authenticity. He effectively communicates the multidisciplinary nature of roller coaster engineering and the importance of soft skills like adaptability and communication. The value lies in the concrete examples of tasks and projects, which help illustrate the realities of engineering work beyond theoretical knowledge.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a personal testimony without external sources. The information is based on the speaker’s own experience, which is reliable for its purpose but not scientifically rigorous. The title accurately reflects the content. The speaker does not cite any scientific literature or official documents, but he provides specific details about the company and his tasks, which adds credibility. The lack of sources limits the scientific rigor, but the video is not intended as a scientific presentation.

164 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a feedback session on the student's academic and internship experience.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a personal testimony from a student about his internship and exchange semester. It provides concrete details about the company, tasks, and life in Munich, but lacks external sources or verifiable data. The information is reliable for its purpose but limited in scope.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a unique perspective on the roller coaster engineering industry, which is not commonly covered in academic settings. It provides practical advice for students considering internships abroad, particularly in Germany. The speaker’s emphasis on the importance of soft skills and adaptability is a valuable addition to typical academic discourse.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Maurer Ride official website — Official company site for more information on their products and projects.
  • Hochschule München — Official website of the university where the exchange took place.
  • Erasmus+ program — Information on the European exchange program that funded the semester abroad.

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows a balanced distribution across the four dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and technical level, reflecting the detailed account of the internship and academic content. The lower score in information quality and reliability is due to the lack of external sources and the subjective nature of the testimony.

Reliability 6/10