काव्यप्रकाशदिशा उपमाविमर्शः Dr.Sourabh Dubey, Asst. Professor, Sahitya, L B S, New Delhi

काव्यप्रकाशदिशा उपमाविमर्शः Dr.Sourabh Dubey, Asst. Professor, Sahitya, L B S, New Delhi

🎙 Dr. Sourabh Dubey 👥 993 📅 April 21, 2026 ⏱ 54 min 👁 28 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

upamasimileSanskritalamkaraKavyaprakasha

Summary

The lecture, delivered in Sanskrit, focuses on the concept of upama (simile) as discussed in the Kavyaprakasha and other classical Indian texts. Dr. Sourabh Dubey begins by defining upama, tracing its etymological roots, and explaining its significance as a fundamental figure of speech. He explores how upama is treated in various shastras, including Nirukta, Vyakarana, Nyaya, and Natyashastra, highlighting the common thread of similarity (sadrishya) that underlies all alamkaras. The speaker elaborates on the components of upama, such as upamana, upameya, and sadharana dharma, and discusses the conditions for its effective use, emphasizing the need for a striking and charming similarity. He also addresses the role of upama in poetry and drama, citing examples from classical literature. The lecture concludes with a Q&A session and a shanti patha.

128 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides a comprehensive and scholarly analysis of upama, drawing from multiple authoritative sources. The argumentation is systematic, moving from etymology to definition, then to components and usage. The speaker supports his points with examples from classical texts, demonstrating a deep understanding of the subject. However, the presentation is entirely in Sanskrit, which may limit its accessibility to a wider audience.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture demonstrates high scholarly rigor, referencing classical texts such as Nirukta, Vyakarana, Nyaya-sutras, and Natyashastra. The speaker’s expertise is evident, and the content aligns well with the title. The video description includes links to related lectures in the series, but no external sources are cited within the lecture itself. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a focused examination of upama in the context of Kavyaprakasha.

145 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a detailed examination of upama in the context of Kavyaprakasha.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The lecture is delivered by a Sanskrit scholar and covers the concept of upama (simile) from multiple classical sources including Nirukta, Vyakarana, Nyaya, and Natyashastra. The content is scholarly and well-structured, but the video quality and lack of visual aids may limit accessibility.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Kavyaprakasha — The main text discussed, providing the framework for upama.
  • Natyashastra — Bharata's work, which also discusses alamkaras including upama.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture offers a deep dive into the concept of upama, synthesizing perspectives from multiple classical Indian disciplines. It highlights the centrality of upama as the root of all alamkaras and discusses the nuances of sadharana dharma and the conditions for effective upama. The speaker’s scholarly approach provides a valuable resource for students of Sanskrit poetics.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Kavyaprakasha — The primary text referenced, a foundational work on Sanskrit poetics.
  • Alamkara — The broader concept of figures of speech in Sanskrit literature.
  • Natyashastra — Ancient Indian treatise on performing arts, which also discusses alamkaras.
  • Nirukta — Etymological treatise by Yaska, relevant to the discussion of upama’s roots.

110 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the lecture's depth and scholarly content. The technical level is moderate, indicating that it is accessible to those with some background in Sanskrit poetics. The overall reliability is strong, given the speaker's expertise and the use of classical sources.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.