Back to the USSR—and Farther: Russia’s War Against Ukraine, Mnemonic Abuse, and Memoricide

Back to the USSR—and Farther: Russia’s War Against Ukraine, Mnemonic Abuse, and Memoricide

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought History NHHistoryNHTHistory: specific events and topics
🎙 Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed 👥 7K 📅 July 13, 2026 ⏱ 88 min 👁 166 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

cultural memorymnemonic abusememoricideNew Year showsoccupation concerts

Summary

In this lecture, Dr. Nataliya Shpylova-Saeed examines how Russia’s war against Ukraine is underpinned by deliberate manipulation of cultural memory. She introduces the concepts of mnemonic abuse and memoricide, building on the work of Jan and Aleida Assmann and Mirko Grmek. The talk traces the evolution of Russian memory politics from the 1990s, focusing on New Year television shows and presidential addresses as tools for normalizing imperial nostalgia and anti-Ukrainian sentiment. She contrasts this with Ukrainian memory practices, which emphasize independence and forward-looking identity. The lecture highlights the escalation from mnemonic abuse to memoricide in occupied territories, where Ukrainian memory is systematically erased and replaced with Russian narratives. She cites examples such as the ‘Time of Heroes’ program and the writings of figures like Romaniekin and Sergeytsev, which advocate for the re-education or elimination of Ukrainians. The talk concludes that these mnemonic strategies are integral to Russia’s genocidal war, aiming to annihilate Ukrainian identity and memory.

156 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides valuable insights into the role of cultural memory in modern warfare, offering a nuanced framework (mnemonic abuse vs. memoricide) that helps explain the persistence of Russian aggression. The argument is well-supported by concrete examples from New Year shows and political speeches, demonstrating a clear trajectory from nostalgia to revanchism. The speaker effectively uses theoretical concepts to analyze empirical phenomena, making a compelling case for the centrality of memory in Russia’s war against Ukraine.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture demonstrates strong scientific rigor, drawing on established scholars like Assmann and Arendt, and referencing specific primary sources such as New Year addresses and articles by Romaniekin and Sergeytsev. The title accurately reflects the content, which traces Russia’s mnemonic strategies from the Soviet era to the present war. The speaker’s academic credentials and the institutional context (Harvard) lend credibility. The description provides a link to the event page, which serves as a source for further reference.

168 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which traces Russia's mnemonic strategies from the Soviet era to the present war against Ukraine.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The lecture is delivered by a Harvard preceptor and memory studies researcher, drawing on established theories (Assmann, Arendt) and concrete examples (New Year shows, occupation concerts). The argument is well-structured and supported by specific references, though it is an interpretive analysis rather than an empirical study.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Event Page: Back to the USSR—and Farther — Official event page with lecture description and speaker bio.

Concurring Sources

  • Event Page — The event page provides context and confirms the lecture's content.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture offers a novel synthesis of mnemonic abuse and memoricide as complementary concepts, applying them to the Russian-Ukrainian context. It provides a detailed analysis of New Year shows as a vehicle for memory manipulation, which is an understudied area. The speaker’s emphasis on the escalation from abuse to memoricide in occupied territories adds a critical dimension to understanding the war.

Pour aller plus loin :

99 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded and reliable lecture. The strongest aspects are information quantity and quality, with slightly lower but still strong technical level and reliability.

Reliability 8/10