Anne Applebaum in Conversation with Serhii Plokhii: Europe in a Time of War

Anne Applebaum in Conversation with Serhii Plokhii: Europe in a Time of War

🎙 Anne Applebaum, Serhii Plokhii 👥 7K 📅 March 11, 2026 ⏱ 87 min 👁 28K 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

autocracydemocracyUkraineEuropeinstitutions

Summary

In this Harvard event, Anne Applebaum and Serhii Plokhii discuss the current state of Europe during the war in Ukraine. Applebaum opens by describing a ‘swerve’ in global politics, where ideas from the 1920s and 1930s are being rediscovered by leaders, leading to a shift away from the liberal world order. They reflect on the post-1989 era, noting the success of NATO expansion and the integration of Central Europe, but also the rise of autocratic leaders like Viktor Orbán who have undermined democratic institutions. Applebaum explains how autocracies are connected through kleptocratic networks and propaganda, and how they aim to defeat liberal democracy. They discuss the fragility of democratic institutions, the importance of courts and civil service, and the dangers of leaders who seek to reshape them. The conversation also touches on Russia’s historical trajectory and the failure of democratic reforms in the 1990s. The discussion is a sobering analysis of the challenges facing democracy today, with historical parallels and warnings about the future.

164 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high, as it provides a nuanced analysis of the rise of autocracy and the challenges to democracy, drawing on historical examples and current events. Applebaum’s argument that autocracies are connected through networks of kleptocracy and propaganda is compelling and well-articulated. The argumentation is solid, with logical progression from the ‘swerve’ to the mechanisms of autocratic consolidation. However, some claims are presented without direct evidence, relying on the speakers’ authority and experience. The discussion is more of an opinion-led debate than a rigorous academic presentation, but the insights are valuable for understanding contemporary geopolitics.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the speakers are credible experts, but the conversation is not a formal academic lecture with citations. The quality of sources is high, as both are renowned historians and journalists, and they reference their own books and historical events. The title accurately reflects the content, and the discussion stays on topic. The event is co-sponsored by Harvard centers, adding institutional credibility. However, the lack of explicit citations and the conversational format limit the rigor. The adequacy between title and content is excellent, as it is a direct conversation about Europe in wartime.

210 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a conversation between Anne Applebaum and Serhii Plokhii about Europe during wartime, focusing on autocracy and the war in Ukraine.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

High-quality discussion by established historians and journalists, grounded in historical analysis and current events. The conversation is well-informed, but it is an opinion-driven debate rather than a peer-reviewed study, and some claims lack direct citations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Event Page — Official event page for the discussion.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The conversation provides a timely and insightful analysis of the rise of autocracy and the challenges to democracy, particularly in the context of the war in Ukraine. Applebaum’s concept of the ‘swerve’ offers a fresh perspective on how historical ideas are being revived. The discussion also highlights the interconnectedness of autocratic regimes and the importance of institutions in maintaining democracy.

Pour aller plus loin :

109 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a moderate technical level. This indicates a content-rich discussion that is accessible to a general audience but still intellectually rigorous.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.