Bing Chat Refuses To Talk To Me (Use This Instead)

Bing Chat Refuses To Talk To Me (Use This Instead)

by Matt Wolfe

Applied Sciences & Engineering AI — Models & Research UYQArtificial intelligence (AI)UYQFGenerative artificial intelligence
🎙 Matt Wolfe 👥 1.0M 📅 February 26, 2023 ⏱ 13 min 👁 21K 📄 news review 🧭 2026-08-28
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Bing ChatChatGPT PlusWeb ChatGPTYou.comAI chatbot comparison

Summary

Matt Wolfe, a tech YouTuber, shares his experience with Bing Chat after Microsoft’s updates that seemingly ’neutered’ the chatbot. He demonstrates that Bing Chat now frequently refuses to answer questions, especially those about itself or comparisons with other chatbots, often ending conversations with a generic refusal message. Frustrated, he explores alternatives, highlighting a Chrome extension called ‘Web ChatGPT’ that adds web search capabilities to ChatGPT, allowing it to access current information. He also tests You.com’s chat feature, which provides web-connected responses. Wolfe compares the performance of these tools, noting that Web ChatGPT gave a more accurate answer about his own identity than You.com. He concludes that ChatGPT Plus with the Web ChatGPT extension is currently the best web-enabled chatbot option, while Bing Chat has become a ‘glorified search engine’ and is no longer competitive as a conversational AI.

138 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a timely, first-hand account of the state of Bing Chat in late February 2023, capturing a specific moment in AI chatbot development. The creator’s argument is based on personal testing and demonstration, which is appropriate for an opinion piece. He shows concrete examples of Bing’s refusals and compares the outputs of different tools. However, the evaluation is subjective and lacks systematic methodology. The argumentation is persuasive for viewers sharing his preferences, but it does not offer a balanced analysis of the trade-offs between the tools.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a personal review and does not cite academic or official sources. The creator references a video by ‘Matt Vid Pro’ for the Web ChatGPT plugin and mentions resources on futuretools.io, but these are not formal citations. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a demonstration of Bing Chat’s limitations and a suggestion of alternatives. The video is not a rigorous scientific analysis but rather an experiential report, which is acceptable for its genre.

180 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the creator demonstrates Bing Chat's refusal to engage and presents alternatives.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a first-hand user experience and opinion piece, not a systematic study. It provides anecdotal evidence of Bing Chat's limitations and demonstrates alternative tools, but lacks rigorous testing or verification of claims.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • Bing — Mentioned as the tool being tested and criticized.
  • Web ChatGPT — Mentioned as the Chrome extension that adds web search to ChatGPT.
  • You.com — Mentioned as an alternative web-enabled chatbot.
  • FutureTools.io — The creator's website listing AI tools.
  • FutureTools Newsletter — Mentioned as a weekly newsletter with AI tools and news.
  • FutureTools Discord — Mentioned as a community for AI enthusiasts.
  • Matt Wolfe's Blog — The creator's personal blog.
  • Mubert — Mentioned as the source of the outro music.
  • FutureTools Desktop Backgrounds — Mentioned as a resource for desktop backgrounds.

Concurring Sources

  • Bing Chat — Wikipedia article on Bing Chat, which corroborates the existence and behavior of the chatbot.
  • ChatGPT — Wikipedia article on ChatGPT, which is the base model for the Web ChatGPT extension.

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a snapshot of the state of Bing Chat in late February 2023, documenting its restrictive behavior after Microsoft’s updates. It offers a practical comparison of web-enabled chatbot alternatives, particularly highlighting the Web ChatGPT Chrome extension as a workaround for ChatGPT’s lack of internet access. The creator’s personal experience adds anecdotal evidence to the ongoing discussion about AI chatbot limitations and user expectations.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Bing Chat (Microsoft) — Wikipedia article on Bing Chat, providing background and context.
  • ChatGPT (OpenAI) — Wikipedia article on ChatGPT, the base model used with the Web ChatGPT extension.
  • You.com — Wikipedia article on You.com, the search engine and chatbot mentioned in the video.
  • Large language model — Wikipedia article explaining the technology behind these chatbots.
  • Prompt engineering — Wikipedia article on the practice of crafting prompts to elicit desired responses from AI models.

144 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with a slight dip in technical depth and reliability, reflecting the video's nature as a personal opinion piece rather than a rigorous analysis. The balance between information quantity and quality is typical for a tech review.

Reliability 5/10

💬 The comments are predominantly negative towards Bing Chat, with many users expressing frustration and disappointment, while some praise the alternatives suggested. Overall, the sentiment is critical of Bing's restrictions and supportive of the creator's viewpoint.