GPTs Are Here: The Best Ones & How to Make Them

GPTs Are Here: The Best Ones & How to Make Them

by Matt Wolfe

Applied Sciences & Engineering AI — Models & Research UYQArtificial intelligence (AI)UYQFGenerative artificial intelligence
🎙 Matt Wolfe 👥 1.0M 📅 November 16, 2023 ⏱ 28 min 👁 164K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-28
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

custom GPTGPT builderAI toolsOpenAItutorial

Summary

Matt Wolfe presents a comprehensive overview of OpenAI’s custom GPT feature, introduced after DevDay. He demonstrates how to access GPTs via ChatGPT Plus, then walks through building a simple GPT using natural language and the configure tab. He showcases his own custom GPT for YouTube title optimization, which uses uploaded data and images to generate suggestions. The video then rapidly reviews several community-created GPTs: Simpsonize Me, DesignerGPT, ConvertAnything, Logo Maker, SEO Mentor, editGPT, Grimoire, Market Analyst, SellMeThisPen, DoubleSpeak GPT, SEO GOAT, LimitlessGPT, and others. He tests some of these, like Market Analyst, which analyzes stock charts, and Grimoire, which generates a website. He also mentions a spreadsheet of GPTs he has curated and notes the overwhelming reception that led OpenAI to pause signups. The video ends with final thoughts on the potential of GPTs.

134 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial practical value by demonstrating the process of creating custom GPTs and showcasing a variety of real-world examples. The argumentation is based on direct demonstrations and personal experience, which adds credibility. However, the evaluations of the showcased GPTs are subjective and not systematically tested, and the video does not provide critical analysis of limitations or potential biases.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is a tutorial and review, not a scientific study. The creator relies on his own testing and community submissions, which are not formally verified. The title accurately reflects the content. The description provides links to resources like a spreadsheet of GPTs and the creator’s website, but these are not scientific sources. The video does not cite academic literature or official documentation beyond the OpenAI interface.

142 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the video covers how to access and create GPTs, and showcases notable examples.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a practical tutorial and review of custom GPTs, based on direct demonstrations and personal experience. The creator provides clear instructions and shows real examples, but the content is largely anecdotal and lacks rigorous scientific validation or external verification of the claims about GPT capabilities.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • GPTs Google Sheet — Spreadsheet curated by the creator listing various custom GPTs.
  • FutureTools.io — Website by the creator for discovering AI tools.
  • FutureTools Newsletter — Weekly newsletter by the creator.
  • FutureTools Discord — Community Discord server.
  • Matt Wolfe's Blog — Personal blog of the creator.
  • Mubert — Music generation tool used for the outro.
  • Tally Form for Sponsorship — Contact form for sponsorship inquiries.

Concurring Sources

  • OpenAI DevDay announcement — Official announcement of GPTs and other features.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a timely and practical overview of a newly launched feature (custom GPTs), demonstrating both creation and application. It highlights the potential of user-generated AI tools and offers a curated list of examples. The main novelty is the hands-on demonstration and the aggregation of community creations.

Pour aller plus loin :

93 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the video's comprehensive coverage and practical demonstrations. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a general audience, while reliability is decent but not fully verified. The overall balance indicates a useful tutorial with some limitations in scientific rigor.

Reliability 7/10

💬 Très positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la grande majorité exprime une forte appréciation pour la clarté et l'utilité du contenu, avec des remerciements et des encouragements, sans critiques notables.