How Dangerous is a Penny Dropped From a Skyscraper?

How Dangerous is a Penny Dropped From a Skyscraper?

🎙 Veritasium (Derek Muller) 👥 21.1M 📅 October 1, 2022 ⏱ 22 min 👁 19.7M 📄 science communication 🧭 2026-08-27
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

pennyterminal velocityair resistanceskyscraperlethal projectile

Summary

The video investigates the myth that a penny dropped from a skyscraper can be lethal. Derek Muller collaborates with Adam Savage to conduct real-world tests, dropping pennies from a helicopter onto a person (Muller) to measure their impact. They find that pennies reach a terminal velocity of about 80 km/h after falling only 15 meters, and the impact is painful but not dangerous. The video explains the physics of terminal velocity, demonstrating with a wind tunnel that a penny has two terminal velocities (flat and edge-on) and oscillates between them. It also explores other falling objects: rain, hail, ballpoint pens, bullets, and historical weapons like flechettes. The conclusion is that while a penny is not lethal, heavier objects like a baseball or large hail can be, with a threshold of about 68 Joules needed to fracture a skull. The video includes a sponsored segment for Brilliant.

146 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides high-value information by combining theoretical physics with hands-on experimentation. The argumentation is solid: it starts with a clear hypothesis, conducts controlled experiments (helicopter drops, wind tunnel), and uses quantitative data (terminal velocities, energy calculations) to support conclusions. The collaboration with Adam Savage adds practical expertise and engaging demonstration. The explanation of terminal velocity and the role of air resistance is clear and accessible, and the video effectively debunks the myth while providing broader context on projectile dangers.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video demonstrates strong scientific rigor. It references peer-reviewed literature (e.g., Villermaux & Bossa 2009 on raindrop fragmentation) and authoritative sources (NASA for the Apollo 15 hammer-feather drop, National Safety Council for injury statistics). The experimental methodology is transparent, and the video acknowledges limitations (e.g., helicopter downwash affecting penny trajectories). The title accurately reflects the content, and the video stays on-topic throughout. The inclusion of a sponsored segment (Brilliant) is clearly disclosed and does not detract from the scientific content.

175 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the core question addressed, and the content thoroughly explores the danger of a falling penny, including experimental validation.

Quality & Reliability

9/10

The video combines direct experimental testing (helicopter drops, wind tunnel demonstrations) with references to peer-reviewed studies (e.g., Villermaux & Bossa 2009) and authoritative sources (NASA, National Safety Council). The methodology is transparent and the conclusions are well-supported by quantitative analysis.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Common myth belief — The myth that a penny from a skyscraper is lethal is widely believed, but the video's experiments and calculations show it is not.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a novel, hands-on experimental validation of a common myth, going beyond theoretical calculations. It offers a clear demonstration of terminal velocity and the role of air resistance, and it introduces the concept of multiple terminal velocities for non-spherical objects. The collaboration with Adam Savage adds a unique perspective and practical testing methodology.

Pour aller plus loin :

117 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level, indicating the video is accessible yet rigorous. The balance suggests a well-rounded educational piece.

Reliability 9/10

💬 Très positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, le public exprime un enthousiasme marqué pour la collaboration avec Adam Savage et la démonstration expérimentale, saluant la rigueur scientifique et le côté divertissant.