XIV Ciclo de Conferencias de Psicología Coaching 18-03-23. Juan Herrera

XIV Ciclo de Conferencias de Psicología Coaching 18-03-23. Juan Herrera

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Psychology JMPsychologyJMNApplied psychology
🎙 Juan Herrera Molina 👥 12K 📅 March 25, 2026 ⏱ 52 min 👁 178 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

sesgosprocesocoachingpsicologíaflexibilidad

Summary

In this conference, Juan Herrera Molina, a psychologist and coach, discusses systemic biases that affect the coaching process. He introduces the concept of ‘process bias’ (sesgo del proceso), which refers to the tendency of coaches to overvalue technical execution and adherence to structured methods over the real effectiveness and the therapeutic bond with the client. He identifies several contributing factors, including the seduction of certainty, the illusion of control, and the inversion of the guiding principle, where the coach tries to fit the client into their own framework. He warns against the tyranny of structure, the overuse of checklists and metrics, and the neglect of the client’s unique needs. He emphasizes the importance of flexibility, organic listening, and validating the client’s emotions. He uses metaphors such as the river and the map not being the territory to illustrate the need to balance method with adaptability. He also draws parallels with acting, referencing Stanislavski’s method and the idea of transcending technique to be fully present. The talk concludes with practical suggestions such as supervision, reflective journaling, and beginner’s mind to mitigate these biases.

182 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into a common pitfall in coaching practice: the overemphasis on process and technique at the expense of the client’s actual needs. The speaker’s argumentation is coherent and grounded in his extensive professional experience, making the points relatable and practical. He effectively uses metaphors and examples to illustrate the concepts, which enhances understanding. However, the argumentation relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and personal reflection rather than empirical research, which limits its scientific rigor. The speaker does not present data or case studies to support his claims, but his practical wisdom is still valuable for practitioners.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker references a few sources, including Stanislavski’s ‘Building a Character’ and the book ‘How to Stop Acting’, but these are not directly related to coaching science. He also mentions the GROW model and concepts like confirmation bias and halo effect, but without formal citations. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a conference on coaching psychology focusing on process biases. The talk is not a rigorous scientific review but rather an expert opinion based on professional experience. The lack of formal references and empirical evidence reduces the scientific rigor, but the practical relevance is high.

211 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on systemic biases affecting the coaching process.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a licensed psychologist with extensive experience in coaching and human resources, and the talk is grounded in practical experience and references to established coaching concepts. However, the content is largely anecdotal and lacks empirical citations or systematic review.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Building a Character — Referenced as a fundamental book for the speaker, drawing parallels between acting and coaching.
  • How to Stop Acting — Mentioned as a recent read, relating to the idea of transcending technique.

Concurring Sources

  • The GROW Model — The speaker mentions the GROW model as a useful methodology, aligning with the idea that structure is helpful but should not dominate.
  • Confirmation Bias — The speaker discusses confirmation bias as a common bias in coaching, which is well-documented in psychology.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk introduces the concept of ‘process bias’ in coaching, which is not widely discussed in the literature. It highlights the tendency to prioritize method over the client’s needs and offers practical insights for coaches to avoid this pitfall. The speaker’s background in theater provides a unique perspective on presence and vulnerability in the coaching relationship.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • The GROW Model — A widely used coaching framework that the speaker mentions, useful for understanding structured coaching methods.
  • Confirmation Bias — A cognitive bias discussed in the talk, relevant to coaching and decision-making.
  • Therapeutic Alliance — A key concept in psychotherapy and coaching, emphasizing the importance of the relationship between practitioner and client.
  • Stanislavski’s System — The acting technique referenced by the speaker, which parallels the idea of being fully present in coaching.

135 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the speaker's extensive experience and the practical value of the content. The technical level is moderate, indicating that the talk is accessible to a broad audience. The reliability score is slightly lower due to the lack of empirical citations, but the overall profile suggests a valuable practitioner-oriented presentation.

Reliability 6/10