XIII Ciclo de Conferencias de Psicología Coaching con Isabel Aranda. 21/01/2026

XIII Ciclo de Conferencias de Psicología Coaching con Isabel Aranda. 21/01/2026

by Isabel Aranda García

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Psychology JMPsychologyJMNApplied psychology
🎙 Isabel Aranda García 👥 12K 📅 January 28, 2026 ⏱ 107 min 👁 204 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

sesgoscoachneutralidadmetacogniciónpsicología coaching

Summary

In this conference, Isabel Aranda, a psychologist and coordinator of the Coaching Psychology working group, addresses cognitive biases that affect coaches. She emphasizes the importance of conscious neutrality in coaching sessions, drawing on Rogers’ principles. The talk begins with an interactive exercise using photos of two individuals to illustrate first impressions and judgment. She then defines cognitive biases as mental shortcuts that arise from cognitive overload, and explains how they can distort a coach’s perception and interventions. She discusses specific biases, including confirmation bias and availability bias, providing examples and strategies to minimize them, such as asking divergent questions and engaging in metacognition. She stresses the need for supervision and self-awareness to reduce biases. The conference is part of a series on biases in coaching, with future sessions planned on client biases and process-specific biases.

135 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in its practical relevance for coaching professionals, offering concrete examples of how biases manifest in coaching sessions and actionable advice to mitigate them. The argumentation is based on established psychological concepts, though it relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and personal experience rather than empirical research. The speaker’s credibility is enhanced by her academic background and extensive experience, but the lack of formal citations and systematic analysis weakens the scientific rigor. The interactive elements and case studies make the content engaging and relatable.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the speaker references key authors like Kahneman and Tversky, and mentions the book ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’, but does not provide specific citations or a systematic literature review. The sources mentioned are credible, but the presentation is more of an expert opinion than a rigorous scientific exposition. The title accurately reflects the content, and the conference is well-structured. No comments were provided for analysis.

172 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a conference on coaching psychology, specifically addressing coach biases.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a psychologist with a doctorate and 18 years of experience in coaching psychology. The content is based on established cognitive psychology concepts (biases) and references key authors like Kahneman and Tversky. However, the talk is largely anecdotal and lacks empirical data or systematic review, and the sources are not formally cited in the video.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

  • Thinking, Fast and Slow — Mentioned as a basic book for psychologists on mental shortcuts.
  • Kahneman and Tversky — Referenced as key authors on cognitive biases.
  • Dunning-Kruger effect — Mentioned in the context of biases.

Concurring Sources

  • Thinking, Fast and Slow — The book supports the discussion on cognitive biases and mental shortcuts.
  • Kahneman and Tversky — Their research on heuristics and biases aligns with the talk's content.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a practical perspective on cognitive biases specifically for coaching professionals, emphasizing the need for conscious neutrality and metacognition. It offers concrete examples and strategies to mitigate biases, such as asking divergent questions and seeking supervision. The interactive exercise with photos effectively illustrates how first impressions can bias judgments.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Cognitive bias — Overview of cognitive biases and their classification.
  • Confirmation bias — Detailed explanation of confirmation bias and its effects.
  • Availability heuristic — Explanation of the availability heuristic and its impact on decision-making.
  • Metacognition — Concept of thinking about one’s own thinking, central to the talk.
  • Supervision in coaching — Overview of supervision as a professional practice.

114 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across information quantity, quality, technical level, and reliability, with a slight emphasis on practical applicability. This indicates a well-rounded presentation that is both informative and accessible, though not highly technical or research-heavy.

Reliability 7/10