How to Implement ISO 27701 in the Real World

How to Implement ISO 27701 in the Real World

🎙 Prabh Nair 👥 184K 📅 May 21, 2026 ⏱ 99 min 👁 5K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ISO 27701PIMSprivacyimplementationGDPR

Summary

In this podcast, Prabh Nair and guest Apoorva Sane discuss the practical implementation of ISO 27701, a privacy information management system (PIMS). They explain that ISO 27701 was created to address the gap in ISO 27001 regarding privacy risks. The 2019 version was an extension to ISO 27001, but the 2025 version is a standalone management system. They emphasize the importance of understanding whether an organization acts as a data controller or processor, and how to map controls accordingly. The conversation covers the implementation roadmap, including budgeting, regulatory influence, and the relationship between CISO and DPO. They stress that privacy should be embedded into people, process, and technology, not treated as a one-time compliance exercise. Key topics include records of processing activity, privacy impact assessments, vendor risk assessments, cross-border data transfers, training, and continuous monitoring. They also debunk myths and highlight that privacy implementation takes months, not weeks. The discussion is aimed at privacy professionals, DPOs, CISOs, and GRC teams.

160 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable insights into the practical implementation of ISO 27701, offering a clear roadmap and addressing common challenges. The argumentation is solid, grounded in the speaker’s extensive experience and knowledge of regulatory frameworks. The discussion is well-structured, covering key aspects such as controller/processor roles, budgeting, and operationalization of controls. The emphasis on embedding privacy into people, process, and technology is particularly valuable. The speakers also address the relationship between CISO and DPO, providing a balanced view. Overall, the content is highly informative and actionable for professionals in the field.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate, as the video is an expert opinion rather than a formal study. However, the information is consistent with established standards and regulations. The sources cited are primarily other videos from the same channel, which may not be authoritative. The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on practical implementation. The discussion is well-structured and covers relevant topics, but lacks formal citations to external sources.

175 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on practical implementation of ISO 27701.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The discussion is led by an experienced privacy and compliance professional, providing practical insights grounded in regulatory frameworks. While it is an expert opinion without formal citations, the content aligns with established standards and regulations.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • ISO 27701:2019 — The standard itself, which the video discusses.
  • GDPR — The regulation that ISO 27701 helps to comply with.

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a practical, expert-driven roadmap for implementing ISO 27701, emphasizing the shift from a compliance exercise to an integrated management system. It offers clear guidance on understanding organizational roles, mapping controls, and operationalizing privacy across people, process, and technology. The discussion on the relationship between CISO and DPO adds valuable perspective.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • ISO/IEC 27701:2019 — The official standard for privacy information management.
  • GDPR — The EU General Data Protection Regulation, which ISO 27701 helps to comply with.
  • Privacy by Design — A key concept discussed in the video.

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a comprehensive and trustworthy discussion that is accessible to a broad audience, though it may not delve into highly technical details.

Reliability 8/10