【大学の有機化学】わかりやすい官能基のIUPAC命名法の優先順位【薬学部生必見】

【大学の有機化学】わかりやすい官能基のIUPAC命名法の優先順位【薬学部生必見】

by ジェイズ / J'z Medical Channel

Formal & Physical Sciences Chemistry PNChemistryPNNOrganic chemistry
🎙 ジェイズ / J'z Medical Channel 👥 17K 📅 December 16, 2025 ⏱ 25 min 👁 2K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

IUPACnomenclaturefunctional group priorityorganic chemistrypharmacy

Summary

This video tutorial explains the IUPAC nomenclature priority order for functional groups in organic chemistry, specifically tailored for pharmacy students. The presenter, J’z, begins by emphasizing the importance of understanding priority rules when multiple functional groups are present. He introduces a mnemonic ‘いい女に返す網戸はあるけどおっさんへはする’ to remember the order: carboxylic acids, acid anhydrides, esters, acid halides, amides, nitriles, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, thiols, amines, ethers, and sulfides. He clarifies that the highest priority group determines the parent name, while lower priority groups are named as substituents. The video covers both parent and substituent naming conventions, including special cases for cyclic structures (e.g., carboxy, formyl, oxo, hydroxy, amino, alkoxy, etc.). Several worked examples demonstrate how to apply these rules, including numbering the parent chain to give the lowest locants to the highest priority group and listing substituents alphabetically. The tutorial also addresses complex structures like acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and lidocaine, showing step-by-step naming. The presenter concludes by encouraging practice to master the patterns.

192 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a clear and structured explanation of a fundamental topic in organic chemistry. The value lies in its pedagogical approach: it breaks down complex rules into manageable patterns, offers mnemonic devices, and walks through multiple examples from simple to complex. The argumentation is logical and consistent, building from basic principles to advanced applications. The presenter’s expertise is evident, and the content is accurate and well-organized. However, the video does not engage with alternative viewpoints or discuss exceptions in depth, which might limit its comprehensiveness for advanced learners.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high for a tutorial: the rules presented align with standard IUPAC nomenclature. The video does not cite external sources, but it references the presenter’s own related videos for further study. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video fulfills its promise. The description includes links to related videos, which serve as supplementary resources. No external authoritative sources are cited, but the content is consistent with established chemistry education.

177 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a clear explanation of IUPAC nomenclature priority for functional groups, aimed at pharmacy students.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video provides a systematic and accurate overview of IUPAC nomenclature priority rules for functional groups, with clear examples and mnemonics. The content aligns with standard organic chemistry teaching and is presented by a PhD holder in pharmaceutical sciences. However, it is a tutorial without citations to primary literature, and the presentation is informal.

Key Moments

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a clear and systematic mnemonic for remembering the priority order of functional groups in IUPAC nomenclature, which is particularly helpful for students. It also provides worked examples on pharmaceutical compounds, bridging theory and practical application. The ‘Pour aller plus loin’ section suggests further exploration of IUPAC nomenclature rules and related topics.

Pour aller plus loin :

95 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a well-structured tutorial that is accessible yet accurate, suitable for students seeking to understand IUPAC priority rules.

Reliability 8/10