Profitabilité des ressources énergétiques distribuées et du V2G au Québec : conditions de succès

Profitabilité des ressources énergétiques distribuées et du V2G au Québec : conditions de succès

🎙 Pierre-Olivier Pineau, Nelson Gonthier 👥 612 📅 January 28, 2026 ⏱ 60 min 👁 116 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

DERV2GprofitabilityQuebececonomic analysis

Summary

This webinar presents a study on the profitability of distributed energy resources (DER) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology for residential consumers in Quebec. The study uses a linear optimization model to simulate the operation of a smart home with solar panels, batteries, and an electric vehicle, aiming to minimize electricity costs. It considers three household profiles, three Hydro-Quebec tariffs, and various investment scenarios. The base case results show that none of the DER investments are profitable for consumers under current conditions, with negative net present values. However, sensitivity analyses reveal that profitability can be achieved under certain conditions, such as higher resale prices for electricity, lower installation costs, and larger battery capacities. The study also highlights the potential impact on peak demand, which could become problematic with widespread adoption. The presentation concludes by discussing the conditions that could make these technologies attractive to consumers, including tariff changes and cost reductions.

149 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high, as it provides a detailed and transparent economic analysis of DER and V2G from the consumer’s perspective, a topic that is often discussed but rarely quantified. The argumentation is solid, based on a clear methodology, realistic assumptions, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. The study does not oversell the benefits and acknowledges the limitations, such as the 15-year horizon and the exclusion of the vehicle purchase cost. The comparison across different scenarios and tariffs adds depth to the analysis.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is commendable, with the use of established data sources (NREL, Hydro-Quebec tariffs, Renewables.ninja) and a clear explanation of the model and its constraints. The sources are cited appropriately, and the study builds on previous work by the same team. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on profitability and conditions for success. The presentation is well-structured, with a logical flow from methodology to results and sensitivity analyses.

169 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the profitability of distributed energy resources and V2G in Quebec, and the conditions for their success.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The study is based on a transparent methodology, using publicly available data (NREL, Hydro-Quebec tariffs, Renewables.ninja) and clearly stated assumptions. The presentation is rigorous, with sensitivity analyses and a clear distinction between consumer and grid perspectives. However, the study is limited to a specific context (Quebec) and relies on certain assumptions (e.g., 15-year horizon, 7% discount rate) that may not reflect all real-world conditions.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • NREL Annual Technology Baseline — Source for battery and solar panel costs.
  • Hydro-Quebec Tariffs — Tariffs used in the study.

Contribution & Novelties

This study provides a rigorous, consumer-focused economic analysis of DER and V2G in Quebec, filling a gap in the literature that often focuses on grid benefits. It offers a transparent methodology and sensitivity analyses that identify the conditions under which these technologies could become profitable. The findings are relevant for policymakers and utilities in designing tariffs and incentives.

Pour aller plus loin :

90 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a well-researched and reliable presentation, though it may require some economic background to fully grasp the technical details.

Reliability 8/10