Learning random dynamical systems

Learning random dynamical systems

🎙 Jeroen S. W. Lamb 👥 3K 📅 February 23, 2026 ⏱ 35 min 👁 99 📄 original study 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

random dynamical systemsiterated function systemsdelay embeddinglearning dynamicsMarkov chain

Summary

The talk by Jeroen Lamb addresses the problem of learning random dynamical systems (RDS) from partial observations. Lamb argues that RDS are underutilized in science and emphasizes the importance of understanding dynamics beyond stationary statistics. He introduces the concept of skew product systems and contrasts the one-point Markov semigroup with the full dynamical structure. He presents examples showing that stationary measures do not capture all dynamical features, such as two-point motion and conditional Lyapunov exponents. The main contribution is a method for learning iterated function systems (IFS) from time series, including cases with partial observations. Using delay embedding, the method recovers the underlying IFS even when the number of effective maps increases. The approach involves clustering and learning transition probabilities. Lamb illustrates with examples like the Sierpinski triangle and random Hénon maps. The work is joint with Emilia Gibson and is based on a recent arXiv preprint.

147 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a compelling argument for the importance of random dynamical systems, highlighting their relevance in modeling complex systems. Lamb effectively demonstrates that traditional statistical approaches, such as stationary measures, are insufficient for understanding the full dynamics. He supports his claims with concrete examples and visualizations, such as the Hopf bifurcation with noise, showing that different dynamics can have the same stationary distribution. The argumentation is rigorous, with references to mathematical proofs and collaborations. The main value lies in proposing a novel learning framework for IFS from partial observations, which is a relatively unexplored area. The presentation is well-structured, moving from motivation to methodology and results.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk demonstrates high scientific rigor, with clear mathematical definitions and references to prior work, such as the delay embedding results by Stark and Broomhead. The speaker cites his own joint work with Emilia Gibson, providing an arXiv reference. The title accurately reflects the content. The presentation includes visual examples that aid understanding, though some technical details are omitted for brevity. The sources cited are credible and relevant. The talk is aimed at a specialized audience, but the content is presented clearly.

204 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on learning random dynamical systems from data.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original research with a clear mathematical framework, rigorous proofs, and references to peer-reviewed work. The speaker is a recognized expert. Limitations include lack of detailed derivations and reliance on visual examples.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Takens's theorem — The delay embedding theorem, which underpins the method for partial observations.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk presents a novel framework for learning random dynamical systems, specifically iterated function systems, from partial observations. The key innovation is the use of delay embedding to recover the underlying IFS even when the number of effective maps increases. This addresses a gap in the literature, as most learning methods focus on deterministic systems. The approach has potential applications in various fields where noise-driven dynamics are prevalent.

Pour aller plus loin :

106 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and technical level, indicating a rigorous and detailed presentation. The quantity of information is moderate, as the talk focuses on specific examples. The overall reliability is high, consistent with the speaker's expertise.

Reliability 8/10