GDI Conference Panel - Where have we got to and where next?

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The panel provides valuable insights into the current state of global development studies, drawing on the diverse experiences of its members. The arguments are well-reasoned and grounded in professional expertise, though they are largely based on personal observation rather than empirical data. The discussion is critical and self-reflective, offering a nuanced perspective on the challenges and opportunities facing the field. The panelists effectively challenge dominant narratives and highlight the importance of geopolitics, democracy, and normative clarity. However, the arguments could be strengthened by more concrete examples or references to specific research.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The panel demonstrates scientific rigor through its critical engagement with key debates in development studies. While no formal sources are cited, the panelists reference concepts and events (e.g., USAID cuts, ACRA resets) that are relevant to the discussion. The title accurately reflects the content, as the panel explicitly addresses the conference’s achievements and future directions. The discussion is well-structured and maintains a high level of intellectual rigor, though the lack of explicit citations limits its verifiability.

The title accurately reflects the panel's purpose of taking stock of the conference and looking ahead.

7/10

Panel of senior academics and practitioners with relevant expertise; discussion is reflective and critical, but no formal citations or data are provided; arguments are based on experience and observation.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 00:00Introduction and framing of the panel by Sam Hickey.
• 02:00Amani Abou-Zeid discusses the timeliness of the conference and the need to rethink development.
• 05:00Tony Bebbington presents six thoughts on the conference, including the centrality of geopolitics and the neglect of internal inequalities.
• 10:00Imran Matin emphasizes the debunking of grand narratives and the need for deliberative democracy.
• 15:00Emma Mawdsley highlights the 'wedge in the west' and the potential for a reset.
• 20:00Audience questions begin, including a call for more systematic thinking about the future.
• 25:00Discussion on the dangers of geopolitical framing and the need for inclusive processes.
• 30:00Panelists respond to audience comments and transition to the second round on what's missing.
• 35:00Amani Abou-Zeid and others discuss gaps, including the need to address little d development and radical uncertainty.

• James Mulholland Videography — Video filming and editing by James Mulholland Videography, as mentioned in the description.

• Global Development Institute — The conference is hosted by GDI, and the panelists are members of its advisory board.