Centering Youth Voices in Digital Health Design

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high, as it provides concrete examples of co-design methodologies and their outcomes. Zeba Khan’s presentation offers detailed insights into the process of engaging youth in creating a health campaign, including the use of workshops, dot democracy voting, and youth-generated content. The argumentation is supported by data on reach and engagement, such as 800,000 people reached and 6,000 website visitors. Dr. Berer’s presentation is equally valuable, presenting a compelling case for using data visualization to enhance reciprocal relationships in research. She argues that traditional pain scales are static and fail to capture variability, and she supports this with qualitative feedback from families. The argumentation is logical and grounded in research. Maline Baron’s presentation, while less detailed, addresses an important ethical issue in digital health research. Overall, the arguments are well-structured and supported by evidence, though the video is a webinar and lacks the rigor of a peer-reviewed presentation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is generally high. The presenters are researchers at UBC and BC Children’s Hospital, and they reference their own published work, such as the paper in the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Zeba Khan mentions a report with more details, and the period pain quiz was developed and validated by researchers in Australia. The sources are credible, though not all are explicitly cited in the video. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on youth voices in digital health design. The webinar is well-structured, with each presentation building on the previous one. However, the video is a recording of a live event, and some technical details are not fully explained. Overall, the sources and title are appropriate and contribute to the video’s credibility.

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on involving youth in the design of digital health tools.

8/10

The video features three researchers presenting their work on youth engagement in digital health design. The content is based on their own research and clinical experience, with references to published studies and a report. The presentations are detailed and reflect a rigorous co-design process, though the video is a webinar recording and not a peer-reviewed publication.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 02:00Introduction to the webinar and speakers by Haley.
• 05:00Zeba Khan begins presentation on 'Period Pain is Real Pain'.
• 10:00Zeba discusses the co-design process with youth partners.
• 20:00Zeba presents campaign results and lessons learned.
• 25:00Dr. Caitlyn Berer begins presentation on 'Living Lab at Home'.
• 30:00Dr. Berer discusses limitations of traditional pain scales.
• 40:00Dr. Berer explains the concept of reciprocal relationships in research.
• 45:00Maline Baron presents her work on risk-benefit communication tool.
• 55:00Round table discussion begins with questions from the audience.

• Period Pain is Real Pain website — Mentioned by Zeba Khan as the main output of the campaign.
• Report on the co-design process — Zeba Khan mentions a report with more details, but the URL is not provided in the video.
• Paper in Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics — Dr. Berer references this paper for the qualitative findings from family engagement.

• Period Pain is Real Pain website — The website is the main output of the campaign and aligns with the presentation.