Leonid Slonimskiy & Artem Kitaev (KOSMOS) AAD Arguments

Leonid Slonimskiy & Artem Kitaev (KOSMOS) AAD Arguments

Applied Sciences & Engineering Astronomy & Cosmology PGAstronomy, space and time
🎙 Leonid Slonimskiy & Artem Kitaev (KOSMOS) 👥 29K 📅 July 7, 2026 ⏱ 71 min 👁 205 📄 lecture 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

temporary architecturematerial reusescaffoldingurban miningadaptive reuse

Summary

The lecture by Leonid Slonimskiy and Artem Kitaev, founders of KOSMOS, presents their architectural practice centered on the relationship between temporality and architecture. They introduce their book ‘Temporary Texture’ which celebrates anonymous, temporary structures like scaffolding and construction nets, arguing that these often-overlooked elements hold valuable lessons for architects. The lecture is divided into two parts: ’temporary permanent’ and ‘permanently temporary’. In the first part, Slonimskiy presents several projects that embrace temporary materials and structures: the Offseason Pavilion in Rioja, made from wine storage cages; the Barcelona Model pavilion, constructed from idle municipal materials like concrete jersey barriers and statues; the Emma Space, a temporary cultural center in an abandoned factory; and the Airbox, a sports pavilion for the World Cup. These projects demonstrate principles of material reuse, economy of means, and adaptability. The second part, presented by Kitaev, focuses on larger-scale built work and reconstructions, exploring how temporary strategies can inform permanent architecture. The lecture emphasizes the architect’s role as a ‘curator of spaces and materials in time’, advocating for a more sustainable and responsive approach to the built environment.

181 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture offers valuable insights into architectural practice, particularly the creative reuse of materials and the significance of temporary structures. The argumentation is solid, grounded in specific project examples and a clear theoretical framework. The speakers effectively challenge conventional notions of permanence in architecture, proposing a more fluid and adaptive approach. The presentation is well-structured, with a logical progression from theory to practice, and the projects serve as compelling evidence for their ideas.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The lecture demonstrates a strong command of architectural theory and practice, referencing historical figures like Vitruvius and Alberti to contextualize their arguments. The sources cited are primarily their own projects and publications, which are credible within the field. The title accurately reflects the content, as the lecture is part of the AAD Arguments series and focuses on their architectural philosophy. The presentation is rigorous, with clear explanations of design decisions and their rationale.

161 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a lecture by the founders of KOSMOS as part of the AAD Arguments series, focusing on their architectural philosophy and projects.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The lecture presents a coherent and well-argued architectural practice, grounded in built projects and research. The speakers demonstrate deep expertise and provide concrete examples, though the content is primarily practice-based rather than peer-reviewed scientific research.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • KOSMOS Architects — Official website of the practice, providing further information on their projects and research.

Contribution & Novelties

The lecture contributes original perspectives on architectural temporality, advocating for the value of temporary and anonymous structures. It challenges the traditional dichotomy between permanent and temporary architecture, proposing a more fluid and adaptive approach. The projects presented demonstrate innovative methods of material reuse and spatial activation, offering practical examples for architects.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Adaptive reuse — Relevant to the concept of reinterpreting existing structures.
  • Circular economy — Related to the emphasis on material reuse and sustainability.
  • Temporary architecture — Directly relevant to the lecture’s focus on ephemeral structures.

91 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, with a moderate technical level. This indicates a lecture that is rich in content and well-argued, but not overly technical, making it accessible to a broad audience.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.