CPA P15 Mock Debrief | Dec 2025 | With Geofrey Karubanga

CPA P15 Mock Debrief | Dec 2025 | With Geofrey Karubanga

🎙 Geofrey Karubanga 👥 883 📅 November 27, 2025 ⏱ 94 min 👁 390 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

IRRNPVrelevant cash flowsprofitability indexexam technique

Summary

This video is a detailed debrief of a CPA P15 Advanced Financial Management (AFM) mock exam for the December 2025 diet, led by Geofrey Karubanga of MAT ABACUS Business School. The session focuses on Question One, which involves preparing a report evaluating the financial viability of an investment in a power energy drink using IRR. The tutor emphasizes the importance of reading instructions, structuring a report, and identifying relevant cash flows. He explains the distinction between discounted and non-discounted cash flow techniques, and provides a step-by-step approach to calculating IRR, including setting up an NPV layout and adjusting for inflation. He also covers sensitivity analysis, profitability index, and discusses drawbacks of Islamic finance and ethical frameworks. The video is practical, aimed at helping students understand examiner expectations and improve their technical depth and professional judgment in AFM.

137 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial value for students preparing for the CPA P15 exam. It offers a clear, structured methodology for tackling complex investment appraisal questions, emphasizing the identification of relevant cash flows and the correct application of IRR. The tutor’s argumentation is logical and well-supported by standard financial principles, such as the use of cash flows over accounting profits for shareholder wealth maximization. He effectively breaks down the question, highlighting key phrases and potential pitfalls, and demonstrates the calculation process step-by-step. The explanation of inflation adjustments and the distinction between real and money cash flows is particularly valuable. The video also covers additional techniques like sensitivity analysis and profitability index, providing a comprehensive review. The argumentation is solid, though it is based on a mock exam and does not introduce novel financial theories.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is appropriate for an educational tutorial. The tutor references standard financial management concepts and techniques, and the content aligns with generally accepted principles. However, no external sources are cited, and the video is based on a mock exam, not original research. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-structured. The tutor’s explanations are clear and consistent with professional exam preparation standards. The lack of citations is typical for such tutorials and does not detract from the educational value. The video does not include any advertising or sponsored content.

242 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a debrief of a CPA P15 mock exam, presented by Geofrey Karubanga.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is an educational tutorial by an experienced tutor, providing structured guidance on exam technique and financial concepts. The content is accurate and aligns with standard financial management principles, though it is based on a mock exam and not peer-reviewed research.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a practical, exam-focused approach to mastering investment appraisal techniques, particularly IRR and profitability index, within the context of a CPA exam. It offers a clear methodology for handling inflation, relevant cash flows, and report writing, which is directly applicable to professional exams. The tutorial’s strength lies in its step-by-step walkthrough and emphasis on common pitfalls.

Pour aller plus loin :

108 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and technical level, indicating a dense, technical tutorial. The quality and reliability scores are slightly lower, reflecting the lack of external citations and the tutorial nature. Overall, the video is a solid educational resource for exam preparation.

Reliability 7/10