CPA P12 Mock Debrief – December 2025 with CPA Zed Muyingo

CPA P12 Mock Debrief – December 2025 with CPA Zed Muyingo

🎙 CPA Zed Muyingo 👥 883 📅 December 1, 2025 ⏱ 156 min 👁 1K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

consolidated cash flowsIAS 7group accountingCPA examindirect method

Summary

This video is a comprehensive tutorial on preparing a consolidated statement of cash flows for the CPA Paper 12 exam, presented by CPA Zed Muyingo. The session begins with an overview of the exam structure, emphasizing that Section A (50% of marks) is purely group accounting. The focus is on the consolidated statement of cash flows, highlighting the key differences from single-entity cash flows: dividends from associates, net cash position on acquisition/disposal of subsidiaries, and dividends paid to non-controlling interests. The tutor then walks through a detailed worked example involving the acquisition of a subsidiary (Tul) and disposal of another (D), covering adjustments for impairment, revaluation, depreciation, profit on disposal, and unrealized foreign exchange losses. The explanation emphasizes the indirect method, starting with operating profit and adjusting for non-cash items and working capital changes. The video provides a structured approach to note preparation, starting with group structure, and offers exam technique advice, such as planning during reading time and adhering to IFRS principles. The session is practical and aimed at helping candidates master this challenging topic.

176 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial value by breaking down a complex topic into manageable steps. The tutor’s argumentation is clear and logical, systematically addressing each component of the consolidated cash flow statement. He explains the rationale behind each adjustment, such as adding back non-cash expenses like depreciation and impairment, and eliminating non-cash gains like profit on disposal. The use of a comprehensive worked example reinforces understanding. The argumentation is solid, though it relies on a single example, which may not cover all possible variations. The tutor’s emphasis on exam technique and planning is practical and adds to the overall value.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video demonstrates scientific rigor by adhering to IFRS standards, particularly IAS 7. The tutor correctly applies the indirect method and explains the treatment of various items in accordance with accounting principles. However, no external sources are cited, and the content is based on the tutor’s expertise. The title accurately reflects the content, as it is a mock debrief for CPA Paper 12. The video is well-structured, but the lack of citations and the single-example approach limit its depth. The tutor’s explanations are consistent with standard accounting practices, but viewers should cross-reference with official standards for comprehensive understanding.

212 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a mock debrief for CPA Paper 12, focusing on consolidated cash flows, presented by CPA Zed Muyingo.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video is a tutorial by an experienced CPA tutor, providing a structured walkthrough of a consolidated cash flow statement question. The content aligns with IFRS standards (IAS 7) and demonstrates a clear pedagogical approach. However, it lacks citations to external sources and is based on a single example, limiting its generalizability.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a clear, structured approach to consolidated cash flow statements, a topic often found challenging. It provides a step-by-step methodology, emphasizing the differences from single-entity cash flows and the importance of note preparation. The tutor’s focus on exam technique and common pitfalls adds practical value.

Pour aller plus loin :

87 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and technical level, indicating a detailed and technically sound tutorial. The quality of information and reliability are slightly lower, reflecting the lack of external citations and reliance on a single example. Overall, the video is a valuable resource for exam preparation.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.