Avoir un enfant (ou pas) | ENS-PSL

Avoir un enfant (ou pas) | ENS-PSL

🎙 École normale supérieure - PSL 👥 75K 📅 May 31, 2026 ⏱ 92 min 👁 822 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-03
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

désir d'enfantmaterniténormes socialeshistoirechoix

Summary

This round table, organized as part of the ENS-PSL History Week 2025 on the theme of ‘Childhoods’, brings together four researchers to question the notion of choice in having children. The discussion focuses on whether the desire for a child is a conscious individual choice or is shaped by social norms. Carole Dubois Avignon (medieval historian) examines medieval sources, noting that the expression ‘desire for a child’ is absent, but traces of desire or non-desire can be found in texts like Héloïse’s letters and judicial records. Emmanuelle Berthiaud (modern historian) shows that in the 18th-19th centuries, the desire for children was implicit in marriage, but became explicit when pregnancy was delayed, with women expressing anxiety about sterility. Antoine Rivière (contemporary historian) discusses the evolution of family policies and the stigmatization of childless couples, particularly in the context of the Third Republic. Emma Tillich (sociologist) analyzes the construction of maternal sentiment and the possibility of refusing motherhood, including voluntary sterilization. The debate highlights how social, religious, and medical norms have historically influenced reproductive choices, while also showing how individuals have navigated these constraints. The discussion concludes with a Q&A session with the audience.

192 words

Critical Evaluation

The round table offers a rich and nuanced historical perspective on the question of having children, successfully deconstructing the notion of a free and individual choice. The speakers bring complementary expertise from different periods (medieval, modern, contemporary) and disciplines (history, sociology), which allows for a diachronic analysis of the evolution of norms and practices. The arguments are grounded in specific archival sources and published research, lending credibility to the discussion. For instance, Carole Dubois Avignon’s use of Héloïse’s letters and officiality records illustrates how the desire for a child was expressed indirectly and mediated by religious and legal frameworks. Similarly, Emmanuelle Berthiaud’s examples from private writings show the anxiety surrounding sterility and the social pressure to procreate. Antoine Rivière’s focus on family policies and the stigmatization of childless couples in the Third Republic highlights the political dimension of reproduction. Emma Tillich’s sociological perspective on maternal sentiment and voluntary sterilization brings the discussion into the contemporary era, showing how the possibility of refusing motherhood has been historically constructed. The moderation is effective, guiding the conversation while allowing for spontaneous exchanges. However, the discussion sometimes remains at a descriptive level, and the question of male desire and paternity is only briefly touched upon, despite the title’s inclusive phrasing. The sources cited are not explicitly listed in the video, but the institutional context and the speakers’ expertise ensure a high level of reliability. The video is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the history of family, gender, and reproduction, offering a critical perspective on the social construction of reproductive choices.

258 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which explores the historical and social dimensions of having or not having children.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The video is a round table organized by ENS-PSL, featuring four academic researchers (historians and a sociologist) who present their research based on archival sources and published works. The discussion is moderated and follows a scholarly format. The institutional context and the expertise of the speakers ensure a high level of reliability, though the format is a debate rather than a peer-reviewed publication.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Savoirs ENS — Platform hosting the video and other academic content from ENS.
  • ENS-PSL official website — Institutional page of the École normale supérieure - PSL.

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a valuable interdisciplinary perspective on the historical and social construction of reproductive choices, highlighting how the desire for a child has been shaped by norms and institutions across different periods. It offers original insights into the ways individuals, especially women, have navigated these constraints.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Histoire de la famille — Wikipedia article on family history, relevant for understanding the evolution of family structures.
  • Maternité — Wikipedia article on motherhood, providing an overview of the concept.
  • Stérilité — Wikipedia article on sterility, relevant to the discussion of involuntary childlessness.
  • Normes sociales — Wikipedia article on social norms, useful for understanding the theoretical framework.
  • Histoire des femmes — Wikipedia article on women’s history, contextualizing the gendered aspects of reproduction.

124 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the academic rigor of the speakers and the institutional context. The quantity of information is also substantial, though the technical level is moderate, making it accessible to a broad audience. The overall balance indicates a well-structured and informative discussion.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.