Pseudo & C°. Marc Bloch et les modes de l'absence (1941-1944)  | ENS-PSL

Pseudo & C°. Marc Bloch et les modes de l'absence (1941-1944) | ENS-PSL

🎙 Anne Simonin 👥 75K 📅 January 27, 2026 ⏱ 28 min 👁 254 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Marc BlochLucien FebvreAnnalesOccupationCensorshipPseudonymIntellectual resistanceVichyCollaborationAccommodation

Summary

In this presentation, historian Anne Simonin examines the complex situation of Marc Bloch during the German Occupation of France, focusing on his removal from the editorial board of the journal Annales and his subsequent use of pseudonyms. She challenges the concept of ‘accommodation’ as applied to intellectuals like Lucien Febvre, arguing that it carries moral judgment and obscures the nuanced realities of the period. Drawing on Étienne Souriau’s philosophy, she introduces the notions of ’trajectory’ and ‘intensity’ to better understand Bloch’s choices. Simonin details how Febvre reinvented the journal as ‘Mélanges d’histoire sociale’ under the umbrella of the Encyclopédie française, a strategy to evade German censorship. She highlights the legal and administrative pressures on publishers, including the requirement for authorization numbers and the role of a censorship commission. Bloch, while absent from the journal’s masthead, continued to contribute under pseudonyms and published critical articles elsewhere, such as his review of Anatole de Monzie. Simonin emphasizes the collaborative yet tense relationship between Bloch and Febvre, and the deliberate reduction of Bloch’s visibility to protect the journal. The talk provides a nuanced analysis of intellectual life under Vichy, illustrating how individuals navigated constraints and maintained agency through subtle acts of resistance.

199 words

Critical Evaluation

Anne Simonin’s presentation offers a sophisticated and well-researched analysis of Marc Bloch’s situation during the Occupation, moving beyond simplistic narratives of collaboration or resistance. She effectively critiques the concept of ‘accommodation’ as a moralizing label, drawing on Sartre’s origins and its juridical underpinnings, and proposes alternative frameworks from Souriau’s philosophy—’trajectory’ and ‘intensity’—to capture the fluid and multi-faceted identities of intellectuals under Vichy. The argument is grounded in archival evidence, including correspondence and journal issues, and engages with existing scholarship (e.g., Peter Schöttler, Natalie Zemon Davis, Philippe Burrin). Simonin’s analysis of Febvre’s strategic maneuvers, such as renaming the journal and placing it under the Encyclopédie française, demonstrates a keen understanding of the institutional and legal constraints of the period. She also highlights the often-overlooked material aspects, like subscription logistics and censorship procedures, which add depth to the historical picture. The presentation is balanced, acknowledging both Febvre’s responsibility and his assumption of it, and Bloch’s acceptance of his removal. The use of Souriau’s concepts is insightful, though one might wish for a more explicit connection to Bloch’s own writings. The talk is dense and assumes prior knowledge of the Annales school and Vichy censorship, but it offers a valuable contribution to the historiography of intellectual life under occupation. The title accurately reflects the content, and the speaker’s expertise is evident throughout. Overall, this is a rigorous and thought-provoking lecture that enriches our understanding of a complex historical moment.

236 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on Marc Bloch's modes of absence during 1941-1944.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a recognized historian, the content is based on archival sources and scholarly debates, and the presentation is nuanced and well-argued.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Savoirs ENS — Platform hosting the video and related academic content.
  • ENS-PSL official website — Institutional page of the École normale supérieure.
  • ENS-PSL LinkedIn — Social media presence of the institution.
  • ENS-PSL YouTube channel — Official YouTube channel of ENS-PSL.

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Philippe Burrin - La France à l'heure allemande — Burrin's concept of 'accommodation' is critiqued by Simonin as moralizing and insufficient.

Contribution & Novelties

This presentation offers a fresh perspective on Marc Bloch’s wartime experience by applying Étienne Souriau’s philosophical concepts of ’trajectory’ and ‘intensity’ to historical analysis. It challenges the moralizing concept of ‘accommodation’ and provides a detailed account of the institutional and legal constraints faced by intellectuals under Vichy. The analysis of Febvre’s strategic use of the Encyclopédie française to bypass censorship is particularly insightful.

Pour aller plus loin :

121 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quality and reliability, reflecting the speaker's expertise and use of archival sources. The quantity of information is also substantial, though the technical level is moderate, making it accessible to a knowledgeable audience. Overall, the presentation is well-balanced and credible.

Reliability 8/10