LESSON 12 - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS: SURVEY, EX POST FACTO & EXPERIMENTAL

LESSON 12 - QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS: SURVEY, EX POST FACTO & EXPERIMENTAL

🎙 Dr. Lydia Wambugu 👥 29K 📅 April 19, 2021 ⏱ 31 min 👁 26K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

quantitative researchresearch designsurveyex post factoexperimental

Summary

This lesson provides an overview of quantitative research designs, emphasizing their role as master plans for data collection and analysis. The instructor defines research design and distinguishes it from methods, then outlines key elements such as approach, data collection, population, and analysis. Factors influencing design selection are discussed, including research problem, purpose, researcher expertise, population, resources, and audience. The main focus is on three quantitative designs: survey, ex post facto (causal-comparative), and experimental. Survey is described as a non-experimental method to describe population characteristics, with subtypes: cross-sectional, correlational, and longitudinal (trend, cohort, panel). Ex post facto investigates causes after effects have occurred, without manipulation, and is compared to correlational design. Experimental design is introduced as the only design that establishes causality, with true and quasi-experimental categories. The lesson concludes by previewing a detailed discussion of experimental designs in the next session.

141 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a solid foundational explanation of quantitative research designs, clearly distinguishing between survey, ex post facto, and experimental approaches. The instructor uses analogies (e.g., building a house) to illustrate the concept of a research design, making the content accessible. The argumentation is logical, progressing from general design principles to specific designs, and includes comparisons (e.g., correlational vs. causal-comparative) that enhance understanding. However, the presentation is largely descriptive and lacks critical evaluation of the designs’ strengths and weaknesses beyond basic limitations. The value lies in its pedagogical clarity, but it does not offer novel insights or address contemporary debates in research methodology.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The content is scientifically rigorous in its adherence to standard definitions and classifications of research designs, consistent with common textbooks. However, no external sources are cited within the video, and the description only provides links to the instructor’s own course and social media, which are not academic references. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a tutorial on quantitative research designs. The absence of citations limits the ability to verify claims independently, but the information aligns with established methodological knowledge. The video does not include any public comments for analysis.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers the three main quantitative research designs as promised.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The content is a structured academic tutorial with clear definitions and examples, but lacks citations to external sources and does not address potential controversies or limitations in depth.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Research Methods Course — Full course referenced in the video description
  • YouTube Channel — Subscription link mentioned in the video

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a clear and structured introduction to quantitative research designs, particularly useful for students new to research methodology. Its contribution lies in its pedagogical approach, breaking down complex concepts into digestible segments. However, it does not present new research or novel perspectives.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Research design — Provides a broad overview of research design concepts.
  • Survey methodology — Details on survey types and methods.
  • Causal comparative research — Explains this design in more depth.
  • Experimental design — Covers experimental design principles.

86 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and moderate scores in technical level and reliability, indicating a comprehensive yet accessible tutorial. The balance suggests a solid educational resource, though not highly specialized.

Reliability 7/10