LESSON 61 - RESEARCH METHODOLOGY || DIFFERENCE BETWEEN METHODOLOGY AND METHODS

LESSON 61 - RESEARCH METHODOLOGY || DIFFERENCE BETWEEN METHODOLOGY AND METHODS

🎙 Prof. Lydiah Wambugu 👥 29K 📅 October 24, 2021 ⏱ 12 min 👁 12K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

methodologymethodsresearch designdata collectionresearch proposal

Summary

This lesson from the ‘Research Methods Class’ channel introduces Chapter Three of a research proposal, focusing on the distinction between research methods and research methodology. The instructor explains that research methodology is the overarching strategy and rationale behind the research, while methods are the specific tools and techniques used for data collection and analysis. The video outlines the typical sections of Chapter Three, including research design, population, sampling, data collection instruments, and data analysis. It emphasizes the importance of justifying methodological choices and aligning them with research questions. The content is aimed at postgraduate students and early-career researchers, providing a foundational overview. However, the presentation is hampered by poor audio quality and a somewhat disorganized delivery, with frequent repetitions and unclear transitions. Despite these issues, the core message is clear: methodology is the ‘why’ and methods are the ‘how’ of research.

141 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a clear and accessible explanation of the often-confused concepts of research methods and methodology. It effectively uses examples to illustrate the difference, such as comparing methodology to a recipe and methods to the specific ingredients and techniques. The argumentation is logical and straightforward, building from definitions to practical implications for writing Chapter Three. However, the depth is limited; it does not delve into specific methodological paradigms or philosophical underpinnings, which would strengthen the argumentation for advanced viewers. The value lies in its pedagogical clarity for beginners, but it lacks critical discussion of alternative approaches or potential pitfalls in methodology selection.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any external sources or references, relying solely on the instructor’s expertise. The description provides links to the instructor’s website and related courses, but these are not explicitly referenced in the video. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a tutorial on differentiating methodology and methods. The scientific rigor is moderate: the information is accurate but presented without supporting literature or citations, which limits its credibility for academic audiences. The video would benefit from referencing standard research methodology texts to enhance its scholarly value.

207 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on differentiating between methodology and methods.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video provides a clear conceptual distinction between research methods and methodology, but the audio quality is poor and the content is basic, lacking depth and references.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Research Methods Class Website — Instructor's website with resources and courses.
  • Consultancy Services — Offers research consultation services.
  • IBM SPSS Course — Course on data analysis using SPSS.
  • Research Methods eBook — eBook on research methods.
  • YouTube Channel — Link to subscribe to the channel.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a clear pedagogical distinction between research methods and methodology, which is a common point of confusion for students. It provides a structured overview of Chapter Three components, which can serve as a useful checklist for early-career researchers. However, it does not introduce novel concepts or advanced perspectives.

Pour aller plus loin :

87 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, indicating a balanced but not exceptional video. The highest score is in fiabilite_globale, reflecting the accuracy of the basic information, while quantite_information and niveau_technique are lower, suggesting limited depth and technical detail.

Reliability 6/10