LESSON 57- CHAPTER TWO ON LITERATURE REVIEW: MEANING, PURPOSE & SCOPE OF LITERATURE REVIEW

LESSON 57- CHAPTER TWO ON LITERATURE REVIEW: MEANING, PURPOSE & SCOPE OF LITERATURE REVIEW

🎙 Prof. Lydiah Wambugu 👥 29K 📅 October 2, 2021 ⏱ 18 min 👁 27K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

literature reviewresearch proposalscopepurposeresearch methods

Summary

This lesson introduces Chapter Two of a research proposal, focusing on literature review. The instructor defines literature review as a systematic identification, location, and evaluation of materials related to the research problem. She emphasizes that it is not copy-pasting but a critical synthesis that builds on existing knowledge. The purposes include locating the study within existing literature, demonstrating familiarity with the field, justifying research approaches, and building the body of knowledge. The scope is determined by context (e.g., PhD vs. undergraduate), the research problem, and institutional guidelines. Factors to consider include ensuring literature is current (within 10 years), relevant, and well-executed. The instructor also advises noting findings, designs, populations, and variables to identify gaps. The lesson concludes with a preview of the next lesson on steps for conducting a literature review.

131 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a clear and structured introduction to literature review, valuable for students beginning their research proposals. The argumentation is coherent, logically progressing from definition to purpose to scope. The instructor uses examples and analogies to clarify concepts, such as contrasting copy-pasting with critical synthesis. However, the content is largely descriptive and lacks empirical evidence or references to specific studies, which limits its depth. The argumentation is based on the instructor’s expertise and common academic conventions, making it reliable but not groundbreaking.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the content aligns with standard research methodology textbooks, but no specific sources are cited within the video. The description provides links to the instructor’s website and courses, which serve as additional resources but are not direct citations. The title accurately reflects the content, covering the three stated objectives. The video is a tutorial, so it does not present original research but rather synthesizes established knowledge. The adequacy between title and content is high, with no misleading elements.

180 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers the meaning, purpose, and scope of literature review as part of a research methods course.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The content is a structured academic tutorial on literature review, based on the instructor's expertise and standard research methodology. It provides clear definitions, purposes, and scope considerations, but lacks citations to specific external sources and empirical evidence, relying on general academic knowledge.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Research Methods Class Website — Main website for the course and resources
  • Research Methods Course — Full course on research methods
  • IBM SPSS Course — Course on data analysis using SPSS
  • Research Methods eBook — eBook on research methods
  • Consultancy Services — Consultation services for research

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a clear and structured introduction to literature review, emphasizing its purpose and scope. It offers practical guidance for students, such as considering the number of sources based on academic level and ensuring literature is current. The instructor stresses the importance of critical review and identifying gaps, which is a key aspect of academic research. This lesson serves as a foundational tutorial for novice researchers.

Pour aller plus loin :

119 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across information quantity, quality, technical level, and reliability, indicating a well-rounded educational video. The technical level is moderate, suitable for beginners, while the reliability is supported by the instructor's expertise and consistent academic framework.

Reliability 7/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.