LESSON 40 - THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING A QUESTIONNAIRE ||THE STEPS FOLLOWED & THE DESIGN OF QUESTIONS

LESSON 40 - THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING A QUESTIONNAIRE ||THE STEPS FOLLOWED & THE DESIGN OF QUESTIONS

🎙 Prof. Lydia Wambugu 👥 29K 📅 July 18, 2021 ⏱ 12 min 👁 4K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

questionnairestepsclosed-endedopen-endedLikert scale

Summary

This video, part of a research methods course, aims to explain the process of developing a questionnaire, focusing on the four main steps and the design of closed-ended and open-ended questions. The instructor, Prof. Lydia Wambugu, introduces the topic by referencing a previous lecture and outlines the steps: defining objectives, operationalizing concepts, formulating questions, and pre-testing. She discusses types of questions, including yes/no, ranking, rating, and Likert scale items, and provides examples. However, the audio is severely corrupted, with frequent interruptions of ‘subscribe’ prompts and unintelligible speech, making it nearly impossible to follow the content. The video appears to be a screen recording of a live session with technical issues. Despite the clear structure, the delivery fails to convey the information effectively. The description includes links to the course website and social media, but no specific academic references are provided. Overall, the video is of low quality due to production issues, and its educational value is minimal.

157 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video attempts to provide a structured overview of questionnaire development, but the argumentation is weak due to the lack of clear explanations and examples. The content is generic and does not offer any novel insights or rigorous justification for the steps presented. The instructor’s arguments are not supported by evidence or references, and the presentation is marred by constant interruptions, undermining the value of the information.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any academic sources, and the only links provided are to the course website and social media, which are not specific to the content. The title accurately reflects the intended topic, but the execution is poor. The lack of sources and the technical issues significantly reduce the scientific rigor of the video.

138 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately describes the intended content, but the execution is severely flawed due to audio issues.

Quality & Reliability

5/10

The video provides a basic overview of questionnaire development steps and question design, but the audio is heavily corrupted with repeated 'subscribe' prompts, making the content almost unintelligible. The information is generic and lacks depth, with no references to academic sources.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Research Methods Class Course — Full course on research methods, mentioned as access to further content.
  • YouTube Channel — Link to subscribe to the channel.
  • LinkedIn — Social media link for the instructor.
  • Facebook — Social media link for the instructor.
  • Instagram — Social media link for the instructor.
  • Live Chat — Contact link for questions.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a basic outline of questionnaire development steps, but its contribution is limited by the poor audio quality and lack of depth. It may serve as a brief introduction for beginners, but it does not provide any novel insights or advanced techniques.

Pour aller plus loin :

79 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows low scores across all dimensions, indicating a video with minimal information content, poor quality, and low technical depth. The only relatively higher score is in fiabilite_globale, but this is still low, reflecting the lack of sources and the production issues.

Reliability 3/10