LESSON 58 - STEPS OF CONDUCTING LITERATURE REVIEW, SOURCES OF LITERATURE REVIEW & ONLINE DATABASES

LESSON 58 - STEPS OF CONDUCTING LITERATURE REVIEW, SOURCES OF LITERATURE REVIEW & ONLINE DATABASES

🎙 Prof. Lydia Wambugu 👥 29K 📅 October 4, 2021 ⏱ 19 min 👁 20K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

literature reviewprimary sourcessecondary sourcestertiary sourcesonline databases

Summary

This lesson, part of a research methods course, focuses on conducting a literature review. The instructor, Prof. Lydia Wambugu, begins by outlining the structure of a research proposal’s chapter two, which includes an introduction, review of empirical and conceptual literature, theoretical and conceptual frameworks, and a summary identifying gaps. She then explains the three main sources of literature: primary (original research like journal articles and dissertations), secondary (reviews and books), and tertiary (encyclopedias and bibliographies), emphasizing the importance of prioritizing primary sources. The lesson details five steps for conducting a literature review: making an outline with keywords, searching for relevant materials, locating and selecting articles (ensuring they are current and relevant), drafting summaries of studies, and synthesizing major themes to identify gaps. The instructor also lists common online databases for social science research, such as ERIC, Google Scholar, Academia, ProQuest, Sociological Abstracts, and SSCI, and provides tips for using them effectively. The lesson concludes with a reminder to capture references accurately and to visit the course website for further resources.

170 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a clear and structured overview of the literature review process, which is valuable for students and researchers new to academic writing. The instructor’s argumentation is logical, breaking down the process into manageable steps and explaining the rationale behind each. She emphasizes the importance of using primary sources and synthesizing literature to identify gaps, which is a key aspect of scholarly research. However, the content is introductory and does not delve into advanced techniques or critical evaluation of sources. The argumentation is sound but relies on general academic conventions rather than presenting novel insights or empirical evidence.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate. The instructor presents established concepts in research methodology without citing specific academic sources, which limits the verifiability of the information. The quality of sources is not explicitly addressed, but the recommendations align with standard practices in social science research. The title accurately reflects the content, covering the steps, sources, and databases for literature review. The video includes promotional segments for the instructor’s website and courses, which are not penalized but are noted. No comments were provided for analysis.

197 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers the steps of conducting a literature review, sources of literature, and online databases.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The content is a structured tutorial on literature review methods, based on established academic practices. The instructor provides clear definitions and steps, but the video lacks explicit citations to external sources and relies on general knowledge. The information is accurate and aligns with standard research methodology, but the absence of specific references and the promotional elements slightly reduce its scientific rigor.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Research Methods Class Website — Mentioned as the main platform for accessing the full course and resources.
  • Research Methods Course — Referenced as the full course that this lesson is part of.
  • IBM SPSS Course — Mentioned as an additional course offered on the website.
  • Research Methods eBook — Promoted as a resource for further study.
  • Consultancy Services — Mentioned as a service offered for research support.

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a structured and accessible introduction to conducting a literature review, specifically tailored for social science students. Its main contribution is the clear breakdown of the process into five steps and the emphasis on using primary sources. While not groundbreaking, it serves as a useful educational resource for beginners.

Pour aller plus loin :

125 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in information quantity and quality, and lower in technical level. This indicates a balanced but introductory educational content, suitable for beginners but not for advanced researchers.

Reliability 7/10