Muslim Futures : Jorge Matthias Dettermann, Delia Cortese, Glaire Anderson and Laila Shereen Sakr

Muslim Futures : Jorge Matthias Dettermann, Delia Cortese, Glaire Anderson and Laila Shereen Sakr

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Religion & Beliefs QRReligion and beliefsQRPIslam
🎙 AbuSulayman Center for Global Islamic Studies 👥 1K 📅 June 18, 2026 ⏱ 87 min 👁 13 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

futurismscience fictionFatimidssocial mediaIslamic art

Summary

This panel discussion, part of the ‘Muslim Futures’ conference, explores the intersection of technology, culture, and Islamic societies. The first speaker, Jörg Matthias Determann, examines futurism and science fiction in Muslim societies, highlighting state-sponsored projects like Saudi Arabia’s Mukaab and Qiddiya, as well as grassroots artistic movements in Syria and Iran. He argues that science fiction flourishes even under repressive regimes, often supported by literalist interpretations of Islam that allow for multiple worlds. The second speaker, Delia Cortese, analyzes how the Fatimid dynasty is represented and reimagined on social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok. She introduces the concept of ‘citizen curators’ who engage in vernacular historiography, often simplifying and presentizing historical narratives for contemporary identity projects. The third speaker, Glaire Anderson, discusses the intersection of Islamic art, history, and video games, exploring how games can serve as a medium for engaging with the past. The final speaker, Laila Shereen Sakr, presents on ‘Contrapuntal Arab/Muslim Futurity,’ focusing on data and embodiment in speculative narratives. The discussant, Nathaniel Greenberg, synthesizes the presentations, noting the common thread of how technology and media shape Muslim futures. The panel highlights the diversity of futurisms in the Muslim world, from top-down state visions to bottom-up creative expressions, and the role of digital platforms in reshaping historical memory and identity.

214 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The panel provides valuable insights into the diverse ways Muslim societies engage with futurism and technology. Determann’s argument that science fiction flourishes even under authoritarianism, supported by examples from Syria and Iran, challenges simplistic assumptions about the relationship between political repression and cultural creativity. Cortese’s concept of ‘citizen curators’ and vernacular historiography offers a fresh perspective on how social media democratizes historical interpretation, though she critically notes the risks of presentism and myth-making. Anderson’s focus on video games as a medium for Islamic art and history is innovative, though the presentation is brief. Sakr’s theoretical approach to ‘contrapuntal futurity’ adds a sophisticated layer, but it may be less accessible to a general audience. The argumentation is generally solid, with speakers grounding their claims in specific examples and scholarly references. However, some presentations are more descriptive than analytical, and the panel could benefit from deeper engagement with counterarguments or alternative perspectives.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speakers demonstrate strong scholarly rigor, referencing academic works, historical sources, and specific cultural artifacts. Determann cites his own book ‘Islam, Science Fiction, and Extraterrestrial Life’ and mentions fatwas by Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid. Cortese references Gary Bunt’s ‘Islamic Algorithms’ and her own publications on the Fatimids. Anderson likely draws on her expertise in Islamic art and digital media, though specific sources are not explicitly mentioned. Sakr’s presentation is more theoretical, referencing concepts like ‘contrapuntal’ from Edward Said, though not explicitly cited. The title accurately reflects the panel’s focus on Muslim futures and cultural production. The discussion is well-structured, with each speaker addressing a distinct aspect of the theme. However, the panel is a recording of a live event, so the quality of audio and video may vary, and some visual aids are not fully visible. The sources cited are credible, but the panel does not provide a formal bibliography, relying instead on verbal references.

319 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the panel's focus on cultural production and Muslim futures, as each speaker addresses different aspects of futurism, digital media, and historical representation.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The panel features established academics presenting research-based insights, with references to scholarly works and specific examples. The discussion is well-structured and critical, though it relies on the speakers' expertise rather than formal peer-reviewed evidence.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Islam, Science Fiction and Extraterrestrial Life — Book by Jörg Matthias Determann, referenced in his talk, supporting his arguments on science fiction in Muslim societies.
  • Islamic Algorithms — Book by Gary Bunt, referenced by Cortese, providing a framework for understanding digital Islam.

Contribution & Novelties

The panel offers a multifaceted exploration of Muslim futures, highlighting the diversity of futurisms across different regions and media. Determann’s analysis of state-sponsored science fiction under authoritarian regimes provides a nuanced counterpoint to assumptions about cultural repression. Cortese’s concept of ‘citizen curators’ and vernacular historiography on social media is a novel framework for understanding digital engagement with Islamic history. Anderson’s focus on video games as a medium for Islamic art and history is an emerging area of study. Sakr’s theoretical approach to ‘contrapuntal futurity’ adds a critical perspective on data and embodiment. The panel collectively underscores the importance of cultural production in shaping Muslim futures.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Gulf Futurism — Relevant to Determann’s discussion of Gulf futurism and its origins.
  • Fatimid Caliphate — Provides background on the Fatimids, central to Cortese’s talk.
  • Islamic art — Relevant to Anderson’s discussion of Islamic art in video games.
  • Edward Said’s Contrapuntal Reading — Relevant to Sakr’s concept of ‘contrapuntal futurity.’

160 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the panel's rich content and scholarly depth. The technical level is moderately high, indicating that the discussion is accessible to a knowledgeable audience but may require some background. The overall reliability is strong, given the speakers' expertise and use of credible sources.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.