GESTIONANDO LA ANSIEDAD ANTE EXAMENES: DE ENEMIGA A ALIADA

GESTIONANDO LA ANSIEDAD ANTE EXAMENES: DE ENEMIGA A ALIADA

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Medicine & Health VFJPCoping with
🎙 Surenpsico 👥 16K 📅 August 17, 2025 ⏱ 70 min 👁 175 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-17
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

ansiedadexámenesgestión emocionaltécnicas de estudiopsicología

Summary

The video is a workshop organized by Surenpsico, featuring psychologists Milagros Gioachini and Valentina Carreño, aimed at helping students understand and manage exam anxiety. It begins by distinguishing normal anxiety from dysregulated anxiety, emphasizing that anxiety is a natural, adaptive response with evolutionary roots. The speakers explain the anxiety circuit using a relatable example of an unexpected exam date, highlighting how thoughts trigger emotions, physical symptoms, and avoidance behaviors. They discuss common causes of exam anxiety, including irrational beliefs, excessive self-demand, academic pressure, poor habits, and procrastination. The workshop then offers practical strategies for before and during exams, such as reverse planning, the Pomodoro technique, cognitive restructuring, and mindfulness. The presentation is interactive, with participants sharing their experiences. The overall message is that anxiety can be managed and even used as a motivational tool, and seeking professional help is recommended when anxiety becomes debilitating.

144 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides valuable, actionable information on managing exam anxiety, grounded in psychological principles such as cognitive restructuring and behavioral techniques. The argumentation is coherent, using a clear framework (normal vs. dysregulated anxiety) and relatable examples. The speakers, both licensed psychologists, offer credible expertise, though they do not cite specific studies or sources. The practical strategies (e.g., reverse planning, Pomodoro) are evidence-based and presented in a structured manner. The interactive format enhances engagement but sometimes dilutes the focus. Overall, the content is informative and useful for students, though it could benefit from more rigorous scientific backing.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate: the psychologists present established concepts (e.g., fight-or-flight response, cognitive distortions) without explicit citations, but the information aligns with mainstream psychological knowledge. The quality of sources is limited to the speakers’ professional expertise, with no external references provided in the description. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a practical guide to managing exam anxiety. No comments were provided for analysis, so public reception cannot be assessed.

183 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on managing exam anxiety and transforming it from an enemy to an ally.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The video features two licensed psychologists (Milagros Gioachini and Valentina Carreño) who provide evidence-based information on anxiety, referencing cognitive-behavioral and contextual therapies. The content is well-structured and practical, but lacks explicit citations to scientific literature, and the presentation is informal with some technical interruptions.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a practical, student-centered approach to managing exam anxiety, combining cognitive-behavioral and contextual therapy insights. Its novelty lies in the interactive workshop format and the emphasis on viewing anxiety as a potential ally. It provides concrete, actionable techniques that are often missing in academic settings.

Pour aller plus loin :

95 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, moderate technical level, and good reliability. This indicates a well-balanced, informative video that is accessible to a general audience while maintaining professional credibility.

Reliability 7/10