クソゲーと思いきや容赦ない鬱展開にメンタル崩壊【クソゲー】【新宿の狼】

クソゲーと思いきや容赦ない鬱展開にメンタル崩壊【クソゲー】【新宿の狼】

🎙 良作鬱ゲーサークル【ゆっくり解説】 👥 132K 📅 July 7, 2026 ⏱ 61 min 👁 45K 📄 opinion experte 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

新宿の狼鬱ゲーストーリーゲーム解説ゆっくり

Summary

The video is a comprehensive walkthrough and analysis of the PlayStation 2 game ‘Shinjuku no Ookami’ (New Shinjuku Wolf), released in 2009. The creator, using the ‘Yukkuri’ commentary style, narrates the entire main story, highlighting the game’s dual nature: a seemingly low-quality open-world action game with high freedom, but with a serious and dark narrative. The plot follows detective Mikami, known as the ‘Wolf of Shinjuku’, who operates on his own code of justice (‘Ore ga Houritsu’). The story begins with the murder of a key witness and the discovery that seven guns have been sold illegally. Mikami must track down the buyers and the mastermind behind the arms dealing, leading to a conspiracy involving the yakuza, foreign organizations, and a tragic past. The video details each of the seven gun owners, their backgrounds, and how Mikami deals with them. It also covers the second part of the game, which involves a larger conspiracy, the death of a colleague, and a final confrontation with the antagonist Kim. The creator provides commentary on the game’s mechanics, such as the ‘Ore Law’ system, and discusses its flaws, including poor graphics and controls. The video concludes with a rating of 3 stars, praising the story but criticizing technical aspects. The creator also mentions a secret character in New Game+ and encourages viewers to try the game.

223 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a thorough and engaging narrative summary of the game’s story, which is its primary value. The creator’s argumentation is coherent, presenting the game as a hidden gem with a serious story despite its rough edges. The analysis of the game’s themes, such as justice, revenge, and the consequences of one’s actions, is insightful. However, the video is primarily a plot summary with personal opinions, lacking critical analysis of gameplay mechanics or broader context. The creator’s enthusiasm is evident, but the argumentation is subjective and not backed by external sources.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any external sources beyond the description’s links to royalty-free music and sound effects sites, which are not relevant to the content. The title accurately reflects the content, as the video indeed discusses a game that appears to be a ‘kuso-ge’ (crappy game) but has a heavy, depressing story. The creator’s commentary is consistent and well-structured, but the lack of citations and reliance on personal opinion reduces the scientific rigor. The video is a subjective review rather than an objective analysis.

192 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which discusses a game initially perceived as bad but with a serious and depressing story.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video is a detailed narrative review of a video game, providing extensive plot summary and personal commentary. It lacks citations to external sources, relying on the creator's own analysis. The information is subjective but well-structured and coherent.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a detailed and passionate walkthrough of a niche game, providing value to viewers interested in the game’s story. It highlights the contrast between the game’s rough exterior and its serious narrative, which is a unique perspective. The creator’s personal commentary adds a layer of engagement.

Pour aller plus loin :

80 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity of information and moderate in quality, with lower technical level and reliability. This indicates a content-rich but subjective review, with limited technical depth and reliance on personal opinion.

Reliability 5/10