“日常のすべて”が化け物に…文明が滅亡した世界で人類の成れの果てと戦う怪奇サバイバルが狂っていた…【ONCE HUMAN】

“日常のすべて”が化け物に…文明が滅亡した世界で人類の成れの果てと戦う怪奇サバイバルが狂っていた…【ONCE HUMAN】

🎙 良作鬱ゲーサークル【ゆっくり解説】 👥 134K 📅 August 31, 2026 ⏱ 42 min 👁 210 📄 documentary 🧭 2026-08-31
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Once Humansurvivalopen worldhorrorgameplay

Summary

The video is a detailed gameplay walkthrough and review of the survival horror game ‘Once Human’, focusing on the ‘Manibus’ scenario. The narrator, accompanied by a fictional dialogue, explains the game’s premise: a post-apocalyptic world ravaged by a substance called Stardust, which has mutated creatures and humans. The player character, a Meta-Human, must capture Deviations and defeat powerful bosses called Great Ones to restore order and return home. The video covers the game’s core mechanics: crafting, base building, resource management, and the unique Deviation system. It then provides a chapter-by-chapter summary of the Manibus storyline, detailing the five Great Ones encountered: Shadow Hunter, Trent, Alexium, Shadow Hound, and Oblivion Lord. Each boss has a unique backstory and location, often tied to environmental mysteries and human tragedies. The video also highlights the seasonal server system, where scenarios reset periodically, and introduces other content like the ‘Le’ dungeon and ‘Prime’ world event. It concludes with a discussion of the game’s lore, suggesting influences from Cthulhu mythos and SCP, and promotes the console release and free-to-play model.

174 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a comprehensive overview of the game’s mechanics and narrative, offering practical insights for new players. The argumentation is based on the narrator’s personal gameplay experience, which adds authenticity but lacks objective analysis. The value lies in the detailed walkthrough of the Manibus scenario, including boss strategies and lore explanations. However, the promotional nature and lack of critical evaluation limit its informational value.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any scientific or external sources; the only links provided are promotional (game download, gift code) and royalty-free music/effect sites. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the game’s horror and survival aspects. The information is presented as subjective opinion and gameplay experience, with no attempt at objective verification. The video’s scientific rigor is low, as it is a promotional gameplay review rather than an analytical piece.

152 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a survival horror game set in a post-apocalyptic world, with emphasis on the bizarre and grotesque transformations of everyday life.

Quality & Reliability

5/10

The video is a subjective gameplay commentary with promotional intent, lacking scientific rigor. It provides detailed game mechanics and narrative but no external sources or verifiable data. The information is anecdotal and based on personal experience.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

  • Once Human official site — The game's official page provides information about the game's features and updates, consistent with the video's claims.

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a detailed walkthrough of the Manibus scenario, providing practical tips and narrative insights. It highlights the game’s unique features such as the Deviation system and seasonal servers. However, it does not introduce new information beyond what is available in the game itself.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Cthulhu Mythos — The game draws inspiration from Lovecraftian horror, which is relevant to understanding its cosmic horror elements.
  • SCP Foundation — The game’s Deviations and anomalies resemble SCP objects, offering a comparison for fans of the genre.
  • Survival game — The genre’s mechanics are central to the game, providing context for its design choices.

105 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with a slight dip in reliability. This reflects the video's nature as a promotional gameplay review, offering substantial information but lacking in scientific rigor and verifiable sources.

Reliability 3/10