8th Annual IP Data & Research Conference Featuring Jeremy de Beer

8th Annual IP Data & Research Conference Featuring Jeremy de Beer

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought Law & Justice LLawLBJInternational law: intellectual property
🎙 Jeremy de Beer 👥 44K 📅 November 10, 2025 ⏱ 72 min 👁 139 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-06
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

intellectual propertytrade warcharges for use of IPCanadainnovation

Summary

Jeremy de Beer, Canada Research Chair in Innovation and Intellectual Property Law, delivers a keynote at the 8th Annual IP Data & Research Conference. He discusses the impact of trade tensions on intellectual property (IP) and the knowledge economy. He introduces three scenarios: IP in rebalancing/retaliation, IP in trade deal renegotiation (especially CUSMA), and IP in economic restructuring. He emphasizes the need for better data on IP flows, highlighting the category ‘charges for the use of intellectual property’ (COIP), which shows a growing Canadian deficit. He presents data showing Canada’s COIP deficit of $11.4 billion in 2023, projected to $12.3 billion in 2024. He calls for more empirical research and policy responses. The talk is supported by CIGI and other institutions, and references upcoming publications.

125 words

Critical Evaluation

The presentation offers a valuable expert perspective on the intersection of intellectual property and trade tensions, a topic often overlooked in mainstream discourse. De Beer’s argument is well-structured, moving from context to data to scenarios. He correctly identifies a gap in available data, particularly the underutilization of ‘charges for the use of intellectual property’ (COIP) statistics. The empirical data he presents, showing a growing Canadian deficit in COIP, is a significant contribution, as it quantifies a problem often discussed anecdotally. However, the talk is primarily an expert opinion, and while he references ongoing research, the full methodology and data are not presented in detail. The scenarios are forward-looking and speculative, which is appropriate for strategic foresight but not definitive. The speaker acknowledges the limitations and calls for more robust measurement tools. The sources cited, including a 2022 book and upcoming CIGI reports, lend credibility, but the talk would benefit from more concrete citations during the presentation. The adéquation titre/contenu is excellent, as the title accurately reflects the conference and the speaker’s focus. Overall, the talk is informative and thought-provoking, but its reliance on expert judgment and preliminary data means it should be viewed as a starting point for further research rather than a definitive analysis.

205 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a keynote at the IP Data & Research Conference, featuring Jeremy de Beer's presentation on IP and trade tensions.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The presentation is grounded in empirical data from Statistics Canada and WIPO, with references to academic work and policy briefs. The speaker is a recognized expert, and the content is well-structured, though it represents an expert opinion with some forward-looking scenarios.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Trade and Knowledge — Book edited by Anthony Tubman and Jri Watal, 2022, Cambridge University Press, cited as leading work on measuring IP value in trade.
  • CIGI policy brief on digital competition and data sovereignty — Upcoming policy brief by de Beer, mentioned as forthcoming.
  • Special report on intellectual property amid trade tensions — Forthcoming CIGI special report by de Beer, containing fuller data and analysis.

Concurring Sources

  • WIPO IP Statistics — WIPO provides global IP data that can be used to compare Canada's COIP flows with other countries.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a novel framework for understanding IP in trade tensions, emphasizing the need for better data on IP flows. It highlights the underutilized category of ‘charges for the use of intellectual property’ and presents new data on Canada’s deficit. The three scenarios offer a structured way to think about future policy.

Pour aller plus loin :

116 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with a moderate technical level. The reliability is strong, reflecting the expert status and use of official data. The overall balance suggests a well-informed presentation with room for more technical depth.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.