Sinem Köklü – Enjeux, pratiques de terrain et méthodologies

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The presentation offers valuable insights into the practical and ethical dimensions of inclusive research, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ families. The argumentation is based on personal experience and the association’s perspective, which adds authenticity but lacks systematic evidence. The speakers effectively highlight the importance of collaboration between researchers and communities, and the need to adapt methodologies to avoid epistemic injustice. However, the discussion remains largely descriptive and could benefit from more concrete examples or comparative analysis.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presentation demonstrates scientific rigor through the speaker’s doctoral research and reference to theoretical concepts like epistemic justice and situated knowledge. However, specific sources are not cited in the talk, and the provided link is to the event page, not to academic references. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on issues, field practices, and methodologies. The talk is well-structured and coherent, though it lacks detailed citations to support its claims.

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on challenges, field practices, and methodologies for inclusive research with underrepresented families.

7/10

The presentation is grounded in the speaker's doctoral research and direct field experience, and includes insights from an association representative. However, it is largely based on personal experience and lacks detailed citations or verifiable data.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 00:00Introduction to the presentation and its context within the EDI day.
• 01:00Sinem presents her doctoral research on coparental families and the motivation for her study.
• 03:00Explanation of different family configurations within LGBTQ+ communities, including PMA, GPA, adoption, and coparenting.
• 05:00Discussion of theoretical frameworks: inclusive science, epistemic justice, and situated knowledge.
• 08:00Sinem shares her fieldwork experience, including recruitment challenges and building trust with the association.
• 10:00Élise introduces the APGL association and its missions, including the research commission.
• 12:00Élise describes the role of the research commission in reviewing questionnaires and supporting students.
• 14:00Élise shares personal experiences participating in studies and the positive impact on her family.
• 16:00Élise discusses challenges with categories in large-scale surveys, such as the INED survey.
• 18:00Sinem poses open questions about legitimacy, engagement, and risks in inclusive research.

• Journée EDI, de la réflexion à la pratique — Event page for the EDI day where this presentation took place.

• Epistemic injustice — Concept mentioned in the talk as a framework for understanding exclusion.