Stabilizing PDE-ML system || How Does Neural Network Training Work || Oct 17, 2025

Stabilizing PDE-ML system || How Does Neural Network Training Work || Oct 17, 2025

🎙 CRUNCH Group: Home of Math + Machine Learning + X 👥 4K 📅 October 17, 2025 ⏱ 140 min 👁 645 📄 seminar 🧭 2026-08-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

PDE-MLneural networkstabilityedge of stabilityMori-Zwanzig

Summary

This seminar features two talks. The first, by Saad Qadeer, addresses the instability of PDE-ML coupled systems, using the viscous Burgers’ equation as a prototype. He identifies spectral bias as the cause, where neural network surrogates fail to accurately represent high-frequency modes, leading to energy buildup and blow-up. A low-pass filter is proposed to stabilize the system, but it reduces accuracy. To improve accuracy, the Mori-Zwanzig formalism is introduced to model the effect of unresolved modes, potentially enhancing the reduced-order model. The second talk, by Chulhee (Charlie) Yun, explores neural network training dynamics, focusing on the ‘Edge of Stability’ phenomenon where sharpness hovers near the stability threshold. He discusses recent theoretical explanations and challenges the low-dimensional subspace assumption, proposing a ‘river valley’ landscape hypothesis. He also analyzes Schedule-Free AdamW through this lens, offering insights into its advantages for large-scale pretraining.

140 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talks provide valuable insights into two critical areas of scientific machine learning. The first talk offers a clear diagnosis of instability in PDE-ML systems and a practical stabilization method, supported by numerical experiments. The argumentation is solid, with a logical progression from problem identification to solution and further refinement. The second talk synthesizes recent research on neural network training, presenting the Edge of Stability phenomenon and a novel ‘river valley’ hypothesis. The argumentation is compelling, though some claims are speculative and based on limited empirical evidence. Overall, the value is high for researchers in the field, offering both practical solutions and theoretical frameworks.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The seminar demonstrates strong scientific rigor. The first talk references the Mori-Zwanzig formalism and provides a detailed analysis of the prototype problem. The second talk cites recent papers on Edge of Stability and Schedule-Free AdamW. The sources are appropriate and up-to-date. The title accurately reflects the content, covering both talks. The presentation is well-structured, with clear explanations and mathematical derivations. The discussions and Q&A sessions add depth and clarify potential ambiguities. Overall, the scientific quality is high, though the seminar format limits the depth of peer review.

206 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the two main talks: stabilizing PDE-ML coupled systems and understanding neural network training dynamics.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The seminar presents original research from two speakers, with detailed technical explanations and references to recent papers. The content is rigorous and well-structured, though it is a seminar recording with limited peer review.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The seminar provides original contributions: the first talk offers a novel analysis of instability in PDE-ML systems, identifying spectral bias as a key factor and proposing a low-pass filter stabilization method. It also introduces the Mori-Zwanzig formalism as a potential improvement. The second talk presents the ‘river valley’ hypothesis for loss landscapes, challenging existing assumptions and offering a new perspective on neural network training dynamics. These insights are valuable for advancing scientific machine learning and understanding deep learning.

Pour aller plus loin :

122 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the dense technical content. The technical level is very high, indicating a specialized audience. Reliability is strong, though the seminar format limits peer review. Overall, the profile suggests a high-quality, technical seminar suitable for researchers.

Reliability 8/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.