[SPHePS] Philippe DESCOLA, "Structures et manières de faire des mondes" (2025/10/08)

[SPHePS] Philippe DESCOLA, "Structures et manières de faire des mondes" (2025/10/08)

🎙 Philippe Descola 👥 1K 📅 October 19, 2025 ⏱ 120 min 👁 1K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

structuralismontologycosmopoliticsnature-culturenon-humans

Summary

In this lecture, Philippe Descola, professor emeritus at the Collège de France, presents his ongoing work on the structuralist approach to the Earth, drawing on his recent book ‘Politique du ferme monde’. He argues that the modern categories of nature and culture are inadequate to understand the current ecological crisis and the diversity of human-world relations. Descola proposes a shift to a more fundamental level of analysis: the detection of regularities in the world, which he calls ‘ontologies’. He outlines four ontological schemas (animism, naturalism, totemism, analogism) that shape different ways of composing collectives, including non-humans. He critiques the modern political institutions that exclude non-humans from the social contract, contrasting them with ‘cosmopolitics’ of extra-modern societies where humans and non-humans are intertwined. Using ethnographic examples such as the Peul’s ‘dudal’ and the Quechua ‘ayllu’, he shows that these collectives are not purely human but include animals, plants, and spirits. Descola calls for a ‘general science of relations’ or an ’ecology’ that would account for the interactions between all kinds of agents. He concludes by suggesting that a new cosmopolitics must overcome the eurocentrism of our concepts and recognize the agency of non-humans.

192 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture offers a high-value contribution by challenging the foundational categories of social sciences and proposing a novel framework for understanding human-nonhuman relations. Descola’s argument is well-structured, moving from a critique of modern concepts to a proposal for a more fundamental analysis based on ontologies. He supports his claims with concrete ethnographic examples, demonstrating the empirical grounding of his theoretical approach. The argumentation is solid, though it relies heavily on his own previous work and may not engage deeply with potential counterarguments.

91 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: Descola discusses structures (ontological frameworks) and ways of making worlds (cosmopolitics).

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a renowned anthropologist, professor emeritus at the Collège de France, and the content is based on his extensive research and recent book. The lecture is well-structured and grounded in ethnographic examples, but it is primarily an expert opinion rather than a systematic review or original study.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Politique du ferme monde — Descola's recent book, based on his Tanner Lectures, which he discusses in the lecture.
  • Par-delà nature et culture — Descola's major work on the four ontologies, mentioned as background.
  • Angelo Biliol's work on the Peul — Cited for the concept of 'dudal' among the Peul.
  • Charles Stépanoff's work on Tuvan pastoralists — Cited for the concept of 'alkodan' among the Tuvan.
  • Marisol de la Cadena's work on the Andes — Cited for the concept of 'ayllu' and the informant's quote.

Concurring Sources

  • Par-delà nature et culture — Descola's earlier work that lays the foundation for the ontological framework discussed.
  • The Tanner Lectures on Human Values — The lectures on which the book 'Politique du ferme monde' is based.

Dissenting Sources

  • Critiques of ontological turn in anthropology — Some anthropologists have criticized the ontological turn for essentializing differences and neglecting power dynamics.

Contribution & Novelties

This lecture provides a novel synthesis of Descola’s ontological approach applied to contemporary ecological and political issues. It offers a critique of modern political categories and proposes a framework for including non-humans in political collectives. The lecture is original in its call for a ‘general science of relations’ and its emphasis on the need to overcome Eurocentrism in social sciences.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Ontology (information science) — Relevant for understanding the philosophical concept of ontology.
  • Animism — A key concept in Descola’s framework.
  • Naturalism (philosophy) — Another key concept in Descola’s framework.
  • Cosmopolitics — Relevant to the lecture’s theme of cosmopolitics.
  • Bruno Latour — Mentioned in the introduction, relevant to the discussion of actor-network theory.

117 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, with a moderate technical level. This indicates a lecture that is rich in content and well-argued, but may require some background knowledge to fully appreciate.

Reliability 8/10

💬 Sur les 0 commentaires analysés, aucune tendance n'a pu être dégagée.