Monster Hunter Wilds est excellent, mais c'est un diamant brut. Mon avis après 60h

Monster Hunter Wilds est excellent, mais c'est un diamant brut. Mon avis après 60h

🎙 Ex Serv 👥 208K 📅 February 28, 2025 ⏱ 29 min 👁 73K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-05
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Monster Hunter Wildsreview60 hourscombat systemopen world

Summary

In this video, Ex Serv shares his comprehensive review of Monster Hunter Wilds after approximately 60 hours of gameplay. He begins by discussing the campaign and story, noting that the narrative is surprisingly engaging and well-integrated, with a focus on the character Nata and the guild’s authorization mechanic. He appreciates the voiced protagonist and the French dubbing, but criticizes the lack of replayability for the final boss and the cumbersome multiplayer during the campaign. Moving to the open world and level design, he praises the seamless environments and dynamic weather but regrets the over-reliance on the Seikret mount’s auto-pilot, which discourages exploration on foot. He highlights the visual and musical quality, though he misses a central hub. The combat section is the core of the video: he explains the new perfect guard, focus mode, and weapon changes, emphasizing how they enhance accessibility without reducing depth. He discusses the monster roster, praising new creatures like Rey Dau and the improved AI of classics. Finally, he addresses the endgame and progression, noting the lack of content at launch but expressing confidence in future updates. He concludes that Wilds is an excellent foundation but a ‘rough diamond’ that will improve over time.

199 words

Critical Evaluation

The video offers a thorough and well-structured critique of Monster Hunter Wilds, based on an extensive playtime of 60 hours, which lends credibility to the analysis. The reviewer demonstrates a deep understanding of the game’s mechanics, particularly the combat system, and provides specific examples of how new features like perfect guard and focus mode alter gameplay. The argumentation is solid, with clear reasoning for each point, and the reviewer acknowledges both strengths and weaknesses, avoiding hyperbole. The sources cited are limited to the creator’s own channels and a few external links, but the review is primarily based on personal experience, which is appropriate for an opinion piece. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video’s structure with chapters enhances clarity. The main limitation is the subjective nature of the review, but the reviewer’s expertise in the franchise adds value. The public comments are overwhelmingly positive, with viewers appreciating the detailed analysis and the creator’s transparency about the earlier video removal. Overall, the video is a high-quality, informative review that provides valuable insights for both newcomers and veterans of the series.

181 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the reviewer praises the game as excellent but notes it is a 'rough diamond' with room for improvement, matching the detailed critique.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The reviewer provides a detailed, structured analysis based on 60 hours of gameplay, with clear arguments and balanced criticism. The video is a personal opinion but grounded in extensive experience, and the creator transparently addresses a previous video removal due to embargo issues.

Chapters

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a comprehensive and balanced review of Monster Hunter Wilds, highlighting both its innovations and shortcomings. It offers detailed insights into the new combat mechanics, such as perfect guard and focus mode, and their impact on weapon playstyles. The reviewer also emphasizes the importance of exploration and contemplation, which are often overlooked in discussions of the series. The analysis of the endgame content and the game’s potential for future updates adds a forward-looking perspective.

Pour aller plus loin :

116 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity and quality, reflecting the detailed and well-structured review. The technical level is moderate, suitable for a general audience, while reliability is high due to the extensive playtime and transparent approach.

Reliability 8/10

💬 Très positif : Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la grande majorité exprime des remerciements et des éloges pour la qualité du test, avec quelques mentions de l'appréciation de la dimension contemplative du jeu et de la transparence du créateur.