École d'été | 3 juin 2026: The social epistemology of argumentation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a valuable conceptual framework for understanding argumentation in real-world settings, moving beyond idealized logical models. The argumentation is solid, drawing on established theories and empirical examples. The use of anecdotes is deliberate and effective in illustrating the role of trust, though it may not satisfy those seeking systematic empirical evidence. The speaker acknowledges limitations and engages with counterarguments, strengthening the overall argument.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker is a credible expert, and the talk is based on a funded research project and a forthcoming book. She cites relevant literature, including social exchange theory and the work of Maya Goldenberg. The title accurately reflects the content. The talk is well-structured and the sources are used appropriately, though the reliance on anecdotal evidence is a limitation.

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the social epistemology of argumentation, specifically the role of trust and power in vaccine hesitancy.

8/10

The speaker is a recognized philosopher with a funded ERC project, and the talk is based on a forthcoming book. The argumentation is structured and draws on established theories (social exchange theory, Foucault), but relies on anecdotal evidence and personal narratives, which limits generalizability.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 02:00Introduction: from logic to social epistemology, book tour announcement.
• 05:00Book overview: 'Reason and Power in Argumentation', limits of rational argumentation.
• 10:00Social exchange theory: Peter Blau, reciprocity, three levels of exchange.
• 15:00Model of epistemic exchanges: opportunity structure, assessment, actual exchange.
• 20:00Power in a Foucauldian sense: relational, productive, not just oppressive.
• 25:00Vaccine hesitancy: Wakefield scandal, not about scientific illiteracy but trust.
• 30:00Anecdote of Lydia Green: from vaccine hesitant to pro-vax via respectful pediatrician.
• 35:00Anecdote of Terra Hills: similar pattern, importance of respect and personal connection.
• 40:00Application of framework: trust as key in assessment level.
• 45:00Conclusion: implications for argumentation theory and practice.

• Reason and Power in Argumentation (book, forthcoming) — The speaker's own book, summarizing the ERC project.
• Maya Goldenberg, 'Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science' — Referenced as a key work on trust and vaccine hesitancy.
• Peter Blau, 'Exchange and Power in Social Life' — Foundational text for social exchange theory.
• Michel Foucault, 'The History of Sexuality' (quotation on power) — Source of the Foucauldian notion of power.

• Maya Goldenberg, 'Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science' — Supports the claim that trust is central to vaccine hesitancy.