
There Must be a Better Way: Thoughts on the Future of Family Law
Keywords
Summary
114 words
Critical Evaluation
The lecture provides a comprehensive overview of current family law issues from a highly experienced perspective. McFarlane’s arguments are well-structured, drawing on his judicial experience and recent policy developments. He demonstrates deep knowledge of the legal landscape, referencing specific acts and consultations. The discussion of cohabitation rights is particularly strong, highlighting the ‘common law marriage myth’ and the need for legal protection. His support for codification of financial remedies is reasoned, though he acknowledges potential pitfalls. The section on surrogacy raises important ethical and legal questions, especially regarding commercial surrogacy and international cases. The lecture is balanced, acknowledging both progress and gaps. However, as an expert opinion, it lacks empirical data or comparative analysis. The sources are primarily legal documents and consultations, which are reliable but not exhaustive. The title accurately reflects the content, and the lecture is accessible to a general audience while retaining technical depth. Overall, it is a valuable contribution to the discourse on family law reform.
160 words
Title / Content Match
The title accurately reflects the lecture's focus on proposing reforms in family law, emphasizing the need for better approaches.
Quality & Reliability
8/10
Lecture by a retired senior judge with extensive experience in family law, referencing specific legislation and consultations. The content is based on professional expertise and recent official proposals, but is not peer-reviewed and reflects personal views.
Chapters
- // Introduction — there must be a better way, and why Parliament has finally moved
- // Four decades of change — Children Act, Domestic Abuse Act and transparency
- // The June 2025 consultation — reforming financial remedies on divorce
- // Codification plus — capturing judge-led change in statute
- // Prenuptial agreements — making qualifying agreements legally binding
- // Cohabitation — 3.5 million couples and the common law marriage myth
- // Why should a child's financial support depend on whether parents were married?
- // Private law and separating parents — keeping families out of court
- // Child focused courts — social work reports before any hearing, £82 million rollout
- // Adoption at 100 — a model built for babies that now serves three-year-olds
- // Lifelong links — maintaining relationships for children in care and care leavers
- // Enduring relationships policy — the government's new ambition for children in care
- // Surrogacy — a law unchanged for 30 years and a growing commercial problem
- // Foreign surrogacy — two women in their 60s, Northern Cyprus and four years in limbo
- // The commercial elephant in the room — and what Parliament must address
- // Conclusion — family law has never stood still, and the future will be digital
Cited Sources
- Gresham College — Institution hosting the lecture
- Gresham College on Bluesky — Social media channel for updates
- Donate to Gresham College — Support page for the institution
- Gray's Inn Reading 2026 — Event page for this lecture
- Q&A Session — Follow-up discussion to the lecture
Concurring Sources
- Law Commission — Independent body that has made recommendations on family law reforms.
- Ministry of Justice — Government department responsible for family law policy.
Dissenting Sources
- Family Law Reform Now
Contribution & Novelties
The lecture offers a unique insider perspective on family law reform, coming from the recently retired Head of Family Justice. It synthesizes recent government consultations and judicial developments, providing a forward-looking analysis. The emphasis on cohabitation rights and the need for legal recognition is particularly timely. The discussion of surrogacy highlights a neglected area of law.
Pour aller plus loin :
- Children Act 1989 — Foundational legislation in family law.
- Law Commission — Independent body that has made recommendations on family law reforms.
- Radmacher v Granatino — Supreme Court decision on prenuptial agreements.
93 words
Radar Profile
The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a slightly lower technical level. This indicates a well-informed lecture that is accessible to a general audience while maintaining depth.
💬 No comments were provided for analysis.