I'm STILL Mad about Dorne in Game of Thrones!

I'm STILL Mad about Dorne in Game of Thrones!

🎙 Quinn's Ideas 👥 1.0M 📅 March 18, 2017 ⏱ 10 min 👁 106K 📄 opinion experte 🧭 2026-08-26
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

DorneGame of ThronesA Song of Ice and Fireadaptationcritique

Summary

In this video, the creator expresses his continued frustration with the portrayal of Dorne in the HBO series Game of Thrones, particularly in seasons 5 and 6. He contrasts the show’s depiction with the book series A Song of Ice and Fire, arguing that the show’s writers failed to capture the complexity and political intrigue of the Dornish plot. He criticizes the characterizations, especially of Ellaria Sand and the Sand Snakes, and the illogical decisions made in the show, such as the deaths of Doran Martell and Areo Hotah. He highlights the show’s deviation from the source material, noting that the books present a more nuanced and compelling story, with characters like Arianne Martell who are absent from the show. The creator also touches on the show’s handling of other storylines, such as the Ironborn and the Faceless Men, and expresses concern about the future direction of the series. He concludes by recommending viewers read A Feast for Crows to experience the superior Dornish storyline.

165 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video’s value lies in its passionate critique of a popular TV show, offering a fan’s perspective on the adaptation’s shortcomings. The argumentation is based on personal opinion and emotional response, rather than systematic analysis. The creator makes valid points about the show’s deviations from the books, but the reasoning is often subjective and lacks depth. For example, he criticizes the show’s portrayal of Ellaria Sand without fully exploring the character’s motivations in the books. The argument is persuasive for those who share his frustration, but it does not provide a balanced or comprehensive evaluation.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any external sources, relying solely on the creator’s knowledge of the books and show. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a rant about the Dorne storyline. The creator’s arguments are based on his interpretation of the source material, but he does not provide evidence or references to support his claims. The video is more of an opinion piece than a rigorous analysis, and its scientific or factual reliability is limited.

187 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which is a rant about the Dorne storyline in Game of Thrones.

Quality & Reliability

5/10

The video is a passionate opinion piece based on the speaker's personal interpretation of the books and show, with no formal analysis or external sources. It relies on subjective judgment and emotional reaction, which limits its scientific or factual reliability.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Patreon — Support the creator on Patreon.
  • Twitter — Follow the creator on Twitter.
  • Facebook — Like the creator's Facebook page.

Concurring Sources

  • A Feast for Crows — The fourth book in the series, which contains the Dornish plot that the creator praises.

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a fan’s perspective on the adaptation of Dorne, highlighting the disconnect between the books and the show. It adds to the ongoing discussion among fans about the show’s quality and fidelity to the source material.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • A Song of Ice and Fire — The book series that the show is based on, providing the original Dorne storyline.
  • Game of Thrones — The TV adaptation, which the video critiques.
  • Dorne — The fictional region in the series, central to the video’s discussion.

88 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows low scores across all dimensions, reflecting the video's nature as a subjective opinion piece with limited factual content and technical depth. The highest score is in 'quantite_information' (4), indicating some information is presented, but the overall quality and reliability are low.

Reliability 3/10

💬 négatif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la majorité exprime une forte désapprobation envers la gestion de Dorne et d'autres intrigues dans la série, avec des critiques virulentes contre les showrunners et des comparaisons défavorables avec les livres.