Humanities In Session | Mark Sanders: A Will For the Machine | 16 April 2026

Humanities In Session | Mark Sanders: A Will For the Machine | 16 April 2026

🎙 Centre for Humanities Research, UWC 👥 1K 📅 June 22, 2026 ⏱ 102 min 👁 25 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

computerizationapartheidautomationSouth African literatureWilliam Kentridge

Summary

The video is a recording of a book launch and discussion at the Centre for Humanities Research, UWC, featuring Mark Sanders, author of ‘A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa’. Sanders outlines his research on South Africa’s entry into the computer age in the 1960s-70s, coinciding with apartheid’s zenith. He argues that the apartheid government saw automation as a means to reserve skilled work for whites, and discusses how this intersected with labor struggles and racial politics. He analyzes responses by writers Miriam Tlali and JM Coetzee, and artists William Kentridge and Handspring Puppet Company. The discussion includes a response from Aiden Erasmus, focusing on sound and technology, and a Q&A session. The talk provides insights into the historical context of automation in South Africa and its cultural representations.

135 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video offers valuable insights into a niche historical topic: the intersection of computerization, apartheid, and the arts in South Africa. Sanders presents a well-argued thesis, drawing on archival research and literary analysis. He connects disparate elements—early computer poetry, office fiction, and puppetry—to illustrate how automation was understood and contested. The argument is nuanced, acknowledging both the negative and positive valences of automation for different groups. The discussion with Aiden Erasmus adds depth, particularly regarding sound and technology. The argumentation is solid, though it is a book launch, so the presentation is more of an overview than a detailed defense.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

Sanders demonstrates scholarly rigor, referencing his own archival work and citing specific sources like the Live Wire magazine and the Harry Ransom Center. He acknowledges the work of other scholars (Rosalind Krauss, Rebecca Roach) and builds on them. The title accurately reflects the content, which is a discussion of his book. The video is a seminar, so it is not a peer-reviewed presentation, but the speaker’s credentials and the depth of the discussion lend credibility. The description provides context and links to the center’s website, but no direct sources are cited in the video itself.

210 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a seminar session featuring Mark Sanders discussing his book 'A Will for the Machine'.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The speaker is a recognized academic (NYU professor) presenting a book based on archival research and literary analysis. The discussion is nuanced and grounded in historical sources, though it is a book launch with limited external verification.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video presents original research on a relatively underexplored topic: the intersection of computerization, apartheid, and the arts in South Africa. Sanders offers a new perspective on how automation was understood and contested in a specific historical context, and how artists and writers responded. The discussion provides a nuanced view of the politics of technology.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Apartheid — Provides background on the system of racial segregation in South Africa.
  • William Kentridge — South African artist known for his animated films and puppetry.
  • JM Coetzee — Nobel Prize-winning South African author, discussed in the video.
  • Handspring Puppet Company — Puppet company that collaborated with Kentridge.

108 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, technical level, and reliability, indicating a well-rounded and credible presentation. The video is rich in content and provides a deep dive into a specialized topic, with a strong academic foundation.

Reliability 8/10